ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired)
Disallowance of proof of claim did not extinguish lien. The Chapter 13 trustee had objected to second mortgage holder’s proof of claim because the creditor’s name did not match the documents attached to claim, and with no response, the claim was disallowed. However, the confirmed plan treated the debt as long term with monthly payments. After entry of discharge, the servicer on the mortgage changed, and the former debtors argued that the lien was voided by claim disallowance. The district court . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – The Now Infamous Castleman Case
Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 2 – Finding the Right Case to Appeal: Finality and Standing
Fast Track to Freedom: Judge Greenlights Early Payoff
SBRA – The Sequel: Leases in Bankruptcy Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021
Critical Case Comment–Be Careful What You Stipulate
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
Saldana v. Bronitsky – Point of View
Taxes & Timing: Calculating Outcomes for Bankruptcy Debtors
Leaders Must Take Action to Halt Foreclosure Crisis for Minorities
Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??