Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

By Professor Nancy Rapoport

Dear Readers:

This column counts as one that salutes one of ethics law’s greatest hits. At the request of the wonderful Regina Logsdon, I’m here to remind you about Nix v. Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157 (1986).

The issue in the case, as I’m sure you remember, has to do with whether a criminal defense attorney who knows that his client intends to commit perjury must still put the client on the stand.

In the underlying case, Whiteside killed Love after a marijuana1 deal went south . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Critical Case Comment – Fee Wars: The Battle Over Debtor Attorney Compensation

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 31, 2024

Debtors’ attorney’s fees can be calculated as a percentage of the presumptively reasonable “no-look” fee for cases involuntarily dismissed prior to confirmation and is an allowed administrative claim which can be paid under § 1326(a)(2).

Members

In the Greatest Hits Department . . .

The Academy

May 26, 2024

Staff Attorney Jeff Leforce brought us this case back in January of 2022 . . . When is Enough, Enough? Pro Se Dismissed with Extended Prejudice (and Violates Bar)

Members

U.S. Trustee Program to Implement Virtual Section 341 Meetings of Creditors Nationwide

The Academy

September 3, 2023

These virtual 341 meetings via Zoom will be implemented on a rolling basis through early 2024.

Absolute Right to Dismiss? Sixth Circuit Says “Yes”

August 8, 2021

By Academy Staff Section 1307(b) provides: On request of the debtor at any time, if the case has not been converted under Section 706, Section 1112, or Section 1208, the court shall dismiss a case under this chapter. This seemingly straightforward provision has generated significant litigation and produced multiple conflicting decisions. Does a Debtor have a right to dismiss a...

Members

Taxes, Offset, and Mutuality

October 13, 2019

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Bankruptcy lawyers are accustomed to evaluating the dischargeability of taxes when deciding when to file a client's bankruptcy case. But as we approach the end of the tax year, a client’s current year tax situation becomes another moving part in the “when do we file” analysis. In the simplest situation, the client owes...

Members

Assessing the Ailing Business Post Pandemic

June 28, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) Long after the human patients recover from the coronavirus, small businesses will still be ailing. And long nights will be spent deciding whether to try to stay in business. As bankruptcy lawyers, we’re going to see people in pain trying to assess what to do next. Business owners may see the exit heading...

Members

Upwardly Mobile: An Analysis of the Telecommunications Deduction Line on the Means Test

Kara K. Gendron

September 17, 2023

“Perhaps the most obvious problem with this instructional language is that it refers to outdated services.”

Members

Motions to Recuse the Bankruptcy Judge

The NACTT Emeritus Trustees

August 11, 2024

Although few are filed, and rarely granted, motions for the recusal of a bankruptcy judge are quite serious. We asked our Emeritus Trustee Committee for their opinion and comments on recusal motions.

Members

Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B

April 18, 2021

Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” APPENDIX B Side-by-Side Comparison of 11 U.S.C. § 1328(b)-(i) and 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)(B)-(C) 11 U.S.C. § 1328(b)-(i) Discharge 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)(B)-(C) Effect of Confirmation (b) Subject to subsection (d), at any time after the confirmation of the plan and after notice and a hearing, the court may grant a discharge ....

Members

From the Editor – Debtor’s Attorney

May 17, 2020

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) No attorney fees for Chapter 7 work in converted case. In a case that began as Chapter 7 and converted to Chapter 13, the debtor’s attorney sought fees for work in the Chapter 7 phase under § 330(a)(4)(B) rather than § 330(a)(1). The Court found the better interpretation of § 330(a)(4)(B)’s language “in...

Members

Ask Ms. Ps & Qs

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

Critical Case Comment – Fee Wars: The Battle Over Debtor Attorney Compensation

In the Greatest Hits Department . . .

U.S. Trustee Program to Implement Virtual Section 341 Meetings of Creditors Nationwide

Absolute Right to Dismiss? Sixth Circuit Says “Yes”

Taxes, Offset, and Mutuality

Assessing the Ailing Business Post Pandemic

Upwardly Mobile: An Analysis of the Telecommunications Deduction Line on the Means Test

Motions to Recuse the Bankruptcy Judge

Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B

From the Editor – Debtor’s Attorney

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: