From the Editor – Dismissal

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Trustee must recoup confirmed plan payments distributed after case dismissal. Construing § 349’s effect of dismissal, the court found the reasoning of Harris v. Viegelahn applicable, with dismissal ending the case and the trustee’s authority to disburse funds to creditors. The trustee was required to recoup post-dismissal disbursed funds so that they could be returned to the debtor. In re Bateson, _________B.R.________, 2016 WL 3475613 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2016).

_______________________

The Honorable William Houston Brown retired in 2006 as a . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Recommendations in Dealing with the Self-Employed Debtor

Andrew B. Finberg

January 25, 2026

Few word combinations sting a Trustee’s office quite like the one-two punch of “self-employed.” The “self-employed” debtor immediately faces additional concerns regarding feasibility.

Members

Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 Signed 2/6/26

The Academy

February 15, 2026

Doubles Chapter 7 no asset case compensation Extends the terms of temporary bankruptcy judgeships

Memories of a Chapter XIII Trustee

November 10, 2019

By C. Kenneth Still, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Retired (1968-2015) January 2, 1968, my first day as Trustee for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern and Winchester Divisions. I really didn’t know what I was doing or why I wanted the appointment. But there I was, duly appointed and ready to go but where...

Members

Disregarding Bankruptcy Protections Can be Costly: How Courts Decide Punitive Damages Awards for Stay Violations

December 15, 2019

By Veronica D. Brown-Moseley and Stephen F. Relyea1 The automatic stay serves as a shield that immediately protects debtors in bankruptcy and their property from a host of creditor collection actions ranging from foreclosure, repossession, and garnishment to collection letters and phone calls. In most instances, the filing of a bankruptcy case forces creditors to cease all collection actions and...

Members

Plan Payments Current But Patience Exhausted

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 29, 2026

Pro se Chapter 13 debtor’s case would be dismissed with a bar on refiling even though debtor was current on her confirmed plan payments due to her abuse of the bankruptcy process, including litigious but pointless pleadings, and continuing effort to relitigate matters already decided by the court.

Members

The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

September 18, 2022

Appendix A 1994 Revised Text of 11 U.S.C. § 330(a), with 2005's Minor Changes Highlighted(1994 version highlighted to show additions and deletions in 2005) (a)(1) After notice to the parties in interest and the United States Trustee and a hearing, and subject to sections 326, 328, and 329, the court may award to a trustee, a consumer privacy ombudsman appointed...

Members

How Late Is Too Late to Object to a Proof of Claim?

Robert G. Drummond

May 18, 2025

A resource you are probably going to want to hang onto. Here, Trustee Drummond, offers readers a concise look at the doctrine of laches and answers how late is too late.

Members

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 4 Selected Cases under Parts VIII and IX of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

December 19, 2021

Introduction Following Part 1's review of the December 1, 2021 changes in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Part 2 and

Members

What Is the Difference Between an Adversary Proceeding and a Contested Matter?

M. Jonathan Hayes

June 16, 2024

A colleague of mine recently asked “what’s the difference between an adversary proceeding and a contested matter?” My immediate response was “very little.” But I decided to take a look at the rules so I can give a little more thoughtful answer the next time I’m asked.

Members

How Guarantors Can Escape Tax on Soured Debt

May 19, 2019

By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) and William J. Purdy, III, Simmons & Purdy (Soquel, CA) Ever guarantee the debt of another? Ever meet anyone who has? Chances are if you’re in business and the business is a C-corporation, an S-corporation, an LLC, or a partnership, when that business borrows money, the lender will require one or more persons...

Members

From the Editor – Dismissal

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Recommendations in Dealing with the Self-Employed Debtor

Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 Signed 2/6/26

Memories of a Chapter XIII Trustee

Disregarding Bankruptcy Protections Can be Costly: How Courts Decide Punitive Damages Awards for Stay Violations

Plan Payments Current But Patience Exhausted

The Effect of “Success” (Or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees

How Late Is Too Late to Object to a Proof of Claim?

Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 4 Selected Cases under Parts VIII and IX of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure

What Is the Difference Between an Adversary Proceeding and a Contested Matter?

How Guarantors Can Escape Tax on Soured Debt

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: