ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
While the statute does not require an above-median income debtor to pay all claims in full faster than sixty months, it is not inappropriate for a bankruptcy court to condition confirmation of a plan to preclude the debtor’s discharge if the plan is later modified to reduce the dividend below 100%. (Gargotta) In re Crawford, 2016 WL 408924 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. July 22, 2016)
Case Summary
The Crawfords filed a Chapter 13 petition in December . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Can a Debtor Cure Another’s Mortgage through Chapter 13?
CARES Act Rebates and Domestic Support Arrears
Are 401(k) Contributions Disposable Income or Not?
More Questions (and Maybe Answers) from the Means Test Expenses Webinar
MARK YOUR CALENDAR . . . NOW!!!
Featured Webinar
Why the FCRA’s Dispute Machinery So Often Breaks Down – A Practical Primer for Bankruptcy Counsel
Rule 3004 Can Help Debtor’s Attorney Save the Day (and the House)
Ms. Ps & Qs
Critical Case Comment