The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
While the statute does not require an above-median income debtor to pay all claims in full faster than sixty months, it is not inappropriate for a bankruptcy court to condition confirmation of a plan to preclude the debtor’s discharge if the plan is later modified to reduce the dividend below 100%. (Gargotta) In re Crawford, 2016 WL 408924 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. July 22, 2016)
Case Summary
The Crawfords filed a Chapter 13 petition in December . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Wholly Unsecured Junior Liens in Chapter 13: The Lien Strip Dance
Are Your Loyalties Divided?
Dollar Amount Increases in Bankruptcy Code
Spitballing Chapter 13’s Image Makeover
Surprise Sanctions: Case Highlights Critical Need for Due Process in Fee Reductions
Looking Beyond Taggart: Is the Contempt Standard for a Stay Violation the Same as for a Discharge Injunction Violation?
Meet an AO Trustee
New Judge Appointed
What Defines a Petition Preparer
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Bears Burden of Proof to Be Ones Own Disbursing Agent