Consumer Advocates Disappointed Private Debt Collectors to Begin Collecting Federal Tax Debts

Program May Increase Scams Involving Phony Tax Collections

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

(WASHINGTON) Consumer advocates expressed disappointment over an announcement that four private debt collection companies were selected to collect federal tax debts, one of which had been terminated last year by the U.S. Department of Education. On September 26, the IRS announced that private debt collectors will begin collecting tax debts next spring. Pioneer Credit Recovery, whose contract to collect student loans was terminated last year by the U.S. Department of Education because it provided inaccurate information to borrowers, is one of the companies the IRS will use.

The IRS was forced to outsource collection of certain overdue tax debts by a law passed by Congress last December. The law requires the IRS to outsource tax debts to private collectors if:

(1) more than one year has passed without any interaction between the taxpayer and IRS;

(2) one-third of the statute of limitations has lapsed and there is no IRS collector assigned; or

(3) the IRS is otherwise not working the debt due to lack of resources.

“Despite the fact that that past experiments with private collectors failed and lost money, Congress forced the IRS to hire the most complained about industry in the financial sector to undertake a vital and core government function,” stated Chi Chi Wu, staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. “This is a terrible development for taxpayers.”

Advocates also expressed concern that hiring private debt collectors will add to the problem of scam artists who pose as IRS collectors. Currently, the IRS has a policy of never calling to collect without first mailing a notice, and has urged consumers to ignore scam calls. When private collectors begin calling taxpayers regarding back taxes, it will add to the confusion and make consumers more vulnerable to these scams.

“Tax scams are #1 in the list of Top Scams according to the Better Business Bureau, noted Linda Sherry, director of National Priorities at Consumer Action. “Forcing the IRS to place tax debts with private collectors is about the worst thing that Congress could have done to make these scams even more dangerous.”

Even with a private collector, the taxpayer should receive at least two written notices before getting any phone calls. Also, taxpayers are not required to deal with private collectors and can always ask that their account be returned to the IRS itself. The private debt collectors will be required to follow the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act which allows consumers to send a letter telling a debt collector to stop contacting them.

Finally, advocates have urged the IRS to put in place several measures to protect taxpayers, such as excluding low-income taxpayers from the program as well as taxpayers who owe debts under the Affordable Care Act. In August, several dozen consumer, low-income taxpayer, and other groups sent a letter urging IRS to adopt these measures.

Press Contacts:

National Consumer Law Center: Chi Chi Wu ([email protected]) or Jan Kruse ([email protected]), 617.542.8010
Consumer Action: Linda Sherry ([email protected] or 202-544-3088)
Consumer Federation of America: Michael Best ([email protected] or 202.939.1009)
Florida Alliance for Consumer Protection: Alice Vickers ([email protected] or 850.556.3121)
Woodstock Institute: Brent Adams ([email protected] or 773.844.5544)

###

The nonprofit National Consumer Law Center® (NCLC®) works for economic justice for low-income and other disadvantaged people in the U.S. through policy analysis and advocacy, publications, litigation, and training. www.nclc.org

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

Copy of Hildebrand-2016
Chapter 13 debtor has no obligation to voluntarily disclose changes in income or the acquisition of post-petition assets absent a request from a party in interest for such information.  (Kendig) In re Poe, 2022 WL 3639415, (Bankr. N.D. Ohio August 22, 2022) Case Summary Mr. Poe filed a Chapter 13 petition in March of 2019.  At the time of filing,...
Members
supremecourt
June 18, 2023
Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians et al. v. Coughlin Supreme Court rules in favor of borrower of tribal loan –Chapter 13 stay applies.  Justices reject tribal immunity from bankruptcy stay.
December 22, 2019
By William Houston Brown, Editor/Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education On December 18, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the City of Chicago’s petition for certiorari, 2019 WL 6880702, from the decision of the Seventh Circuit at 926 F.3d 916 (7th Cir. June 19, 2019). The Seventh Circuit’s decision was analyzed in a prior article on this website. In its decision,...
Members
October 13, 2019
IRS officials announced on 10/8/19 that a new payment option has been added to the private debt collection program to make it easier for those who owe to pay their tax debts. Taxpayers now can choose the convenient option of a preauthorized direct debit to make one payment or a series of payments toward their federal tax debt. With direct...
Members
August 16, 2020
By Hon. Brian Lynch, Bankruptcy Judge, WAWB “[T]he bankruptcy court has a duty to review fee applications, notwithstanding the absence of objections by the United States trustee (“UST”), creditors, or any other interested party….” In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Ctrs., Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 841 (3d Cir. 1994). In Chapter 13 cases this role is critical because in this judge’s...
Members
October 6, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) One of the most difficult situations faced by a debtor and debtors’ counsel is the repossession of important collateral securing a debt owed to a creditor. These items, such as automobiles, furniture, boats, and mowers which have been pledged to a creditor are important – often critical – to...
Members
May 10, 2020
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) The timeless questions asked by mankind include “why are we here“, “which came first ...” and “coffee or tea“. Bankruptcy lawyers wrestle with “which controls, b-22 or Schedules I and J“. Having argued and lost the Pak case when BAPCPA was new, and felt vindicated when
Members
judgebaxter
August 20, 2023
Passing of Retired Ohio Judge Judge Baxter was appointed United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Ohio on December 16, 1985, and served in the Court’s Cleveland, Ohio location until his retirement in 2011. He served as Chief Judge between 2004 and 2008. Click here for obituary.
Miller_Deb_pp
November 12, 2023
Just a few more weeks ‘til principal and interest gotta be listed separately on a POC.
Members
October 20, 2019
(First published here on August 19, 2019. Used with permission.) By Daniel Cohn, Esq., Legal Department, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. General Rule: No Primary Residence Mortgage Changes The general rule in bankruptcy is that debtors cannot cram down loans secured only by mortgages on their primary residences. But wait, “what’s a cram down?” you ask. For non-bankruptcy folks, a cram...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: