Consumer Advocates Disappointed Private Debt Collectors to Begin Collecting Federal Tax Debts

Program May Increase Scams Involving Phony Tax Collections

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

(WASHINGTON) Consumer advocates expressed disappointment over an announcement that four private debt collection companies were selected to collect federal tax debts, one of which had been terminated last year by the U.S. Department of Education. On September 26, the IRS announced that private debt collectors will begin collecting tax debts next spring. Pioneer Credit Recovery, whose contract to collect student loans was terminated last year by the U.S. Department of Education because it provided inaccurate information to borrowers, is one of the companies the IRS will use.

The IRS was forced to outsource collection of certain overdue tax debts by a law passed by Congress last December. The law requires the IRS to outsource tax debts to private collectors if:

(1) more than one year has passed without any interaction between the taxpayer and IRS;

(2) one-third of the statute of limitations has lapsed and there is no IRS collector assigned; or

(3) the IRS is otherwise not working the debt due to lack of resources.

“Despite the fact that that past experiments with private collectors failed and lost money, Congress forced the IRS to hire the most complained about industry in the financial sector to undertake a vital and core government function,” stated Chi Chi Wu, staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. “This is a terrible development for taxpayers.”

Advocates also expressed concern that hiring private debt collectors will add to the problem of scam artists who pose as IRS collectors. Currently, the IRS has a policy of never calling to collect without first mailing a notice, and has urged consumers to ignore scam calls. When private collectors begin calling taxpayers regarding back taxes, it will add to the confusion and make consumers more vulnerable to these scams.

“Tax scams are #1 in the list of Top Scams according to the Better Business Bureau, noted Linda Sherry, director of National Priorities at Consumer Action. “Forcing the IRS to place tax debts with private collectors is about the worst thing that Congress could have done to make these scams even more dangerous.”

Even with a private collector, the taxpayer should receive at least two written notices before getting any phone calls. Also, taxpayers are not required to deal with private collectors and can always ask that their account be returned to the IRS itself. The private debt collectors will be required to follow the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act which allows consumers to send a letter telling a debt collector to stop contacting them.

Finally, advocates have urged the IRS to put in place several measures to protect taxpayers, such as excluding low-income taxpayers from the program as well as taxpayers who owe debts under the Affordable Care Act. In August, several dozen consumer, low-income taxpayer, and other groups sent a letter urging IRS to adopt these measures.

Press Contacts:

National Consumer Law Center: Chi Chi Wu ([email protected]) or Jan Kruse ([email protected]), 617.542.8010
Consumer Action: Linda Sherry ([email protected] or 202-544-3088)
Consumer Federation of America: Michael Best ([email protected] or 202.939.1009)
Florida Alliance for Consumer Protection: Alice Vickers ([email protected] or 850.556.3121)
Woodstock Institute: Brent Adams ([email protected] or 773.844.5544)

###

The nonprofit National Consumer Law Center® (NCLC®) works for economic justice for low-income and other disadvantaged people in the U.S. through policy analysis and advocacy, publications, litigation, and training. www.nclc.org

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

Sensenich
September 29, 2024
Jan Sensenich is retiring today . . . . Bidding farewell to Jan is no easy task. He has been a well-respected Chapter 12 Trustee and Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for 33 years . . . We love and will miss you, Jan, but won’t miss you too much! Jan plans to continue writing for ConsiderChapter13.org!!
DeCarlo01
October 16, 2022
The facts in In re DeWitt, 2022 WL 4588320 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2022), are a bit “unusual”. Debtor filed Chapter 13 to reinstate her mortgage. The mortgage was “non-escrowed” and Debtor was required to pay property taxes directly. Surprisingly, she did not pay her property taxes. The first time, the Lender paid the property taxes but decided not to pursue...
Members
moran_cathy
December 1, 2024
Stay tuned as next week we will bring you the Counter-Point to Moran’s POV.
Members
March 14, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Exemptions are determined at the time the debtor files for bankruptcy. … This maxim is called the "snapshot" rule because the debtor's financial situation is frozen in time, as if someone had taken a snapshot of it.1 Recent Caselaw The First and Ninth Circuits On March 1, the Ninth Circuit...
Members
lopezcastro
June 4, 2023
Honorable Corali Lopez-Castro Appointed Miami’s Newest Bankruptcy Judge
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
December 12, 2021
If a Chapter 13 plan makes no provision for a mortgage obligation, omits any treatment of the mortgage claims, and prohibits the Trustee from making disbursements toward the claims, the claims are not provided for by the plan and the plan can be confirmed over the objection of the creditor and the trustee; nothing requires a plan to provide for...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
September 15, 2024
Failure of a Chapter 13 debtor to disclose the existence of a cause of action which accrued prior to or shortly after the filing of the petition merits dismissal of the case with a one-year bar against a subsequent bankruptcy filing.
Members
July 28, 2019
By John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio, Western Division Click here for Part 1 Click here for Part 2 C. What Post-Petition Assets Are Property . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join Now Or Sign In Below: Username or Email Password...
Members
Stefan
September 1, 2024
Gregory D. Stefan was appointed as a Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of Virginia effective May 1, 2023. He follows in the footsteps of Michael P. Cotter upon his retirement.
Members
joseph 12-2024
August 28, 2022
An attorney meets with a potential client about a recent auto accident personal injury claim. The client suffered severe injuries and may be entitled to a large award. The client fails to mention that he is a debtor in an active bankruptcy. The client also has failed to advise his bankruptcy attorney about the personal injury claim. The debtor/client does...

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: