The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
There is nothing inherently wrong or in bad faith for a poor but struggling debtor to file a Chapter 13 plan where the results pay only the filing fee, the attorney’s fee, and the Trustee commission; whether a particular case is filed in good faith or is feasible is determined on a case by case basis. In re Wark, 2015 WL 927216 (Bk.D. Kans. December 17, 2015) (Karlin)
Case Summary
The United States Trustee contested the confirmation . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
New Payment Option Available to Taxpayers in Private Debt Collection Program
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 10 Once Again: The Supreme Court Hands Down a Procedure Rule in Dupree v. Younger
Trustee Cannot Require Debtor to Treat Nondischargeable Student Loan Debts in a Separate Class
Employers Who Provide Leave Might Qualify to Claim Valuable Credit
The Smart Way to Cut Out the IRS
Section 302: Joint but Separate
Critical Case Comment – Bad Faith to Not Pay Both Tests?
Escrow 101 – Part 3 of 3
Undersecured Short-Term Mortgages May be Crammed Down
Critical Case Comment – Nothing Requires a Plan to Provide for All Secured Claims