By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) On its face, Diaz (Diaz v. Viegelahn, No. 19-50982 (5th Cir. Aug. 26, 2020)) is a pretty straightforward decision that struck down a local form plan as violating a below-median income debtor's right to use her tax refund to finance necessary expenses for maintenance and support. On a deeper level,...
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
There is nothing inherently wrong or in bad faith for a poor but struggling debtor to file a Chapter 13 plan where the results pay only the filing fee, the attorney’s fee, and the Trustee commission; whether a particular case is filed in good faith or is feasible is determined on a case by case basis. In re Wark, 2015 WL 927216 (Bk.D. Kans. December 17, 2015) (Karlin)
Case Summary
The United States Trustee contested the confirmation . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Mortgage Loan Modification Does Not Alter Lien Priority
Small Business Reorganization Act…(“SBRA”) H.R. 3311 – Part Three
Meet the Newest Trustee
Find The Hidden Mortgage Interest Tax Deduction in Bankruptcy
Guesswork Doesn’t Modify Plans
Diaz: Is it Really a Tax Refund?
Vesting Victories: Chapter 13 Debtors Shielded Against Unlisted Asset Claims
Is That AI in Your Inbox or Are You Just Happy to Paste Me?
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act
Plan Payments Current But Patience Exhausted