By William Houston Brown, Editor/Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education On December 18, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the City of Chicago’s petition for certiorari, 2019 WL 6880702, from the decision of the Seventh Circuit at 926 F.3d 916 (7th Cir. June 19, 2019). The Seventh Circuit’s decision was analyzed in a prior article on this website. In its decision,...
From the Editor – Best Interests of Creditors Test
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Postpetition domestic support obligation was not allowed claim and best interests test failed. Although the Code defines domestic support obligation to include pre- and postpetition obligations, and the debtor may deduct postpetition domestic support obligations in the projected disposable income calculation, § 502(b)(5) disallows a claim to the extent it is for a debt unmatured at petition date, while the debt is excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(5). Only the prepetition DSO claim is an “allowed claim,” notwithstanding other Code requirements that the debtor pay postpetition domestic . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Undersecured Short-Term Mortgages May be Crammed Down
IRS Warns of Impersonation Email Scam; Reminds Taxpayers IRS Does Not Send Unsolicited Emails
Reaffirmations Impose Impossible Demands on Bankruptcy Counsel
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Post-Petition Changes in Value
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in City of Chicago v. Fulton
The Smart Way to Cut Out the IRS
Supreme Court Corner – No Lien Stripping in Chapter 7
Senior Moments
SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know – Part 8 of 8
Treatment of Luxury Assets Under Chapter 13