The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Insufficient notice justified allowance of late-filed claim. The debtor did not schedule IRS, resulting in IRS not receiving notice of the claims’ bar date for governmental entities. Discussing the split of authority on whether lack of notice of the case filing permits allowance, the court found justification for allowance, reasoning that the claims bar date is not absolute when there is no notice to the creditor, since the Code assumes that the creditor actually received notice. Fundamental fairness questions prevailed, and denial of IRS’s claim would adversely . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
Choice of Staying in Chapter 13 or Converting to 7? Circuits Show It Makes a Difference
IRS Extends April 15, Other Upcoming Deadlines for Alabama Storm Victims, Provides Other Tax Relief
Critical Case Comment
Duty to Update Trustee Regarding Changes Post-Plan Confirmation
Taxpayers Should Beware of Property Lien Scam
Leading a Winning Team
Critical Case Comment
The Uneasy Co-Existence of Federal and State Consumer Remedies in Bankruptcy Cases – the Fourth Circuit Weighs In