From the Editor – Claims

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Insufficient notice justified allowance of late-filed claim. The debtor did not schedule IRS, resulting in IRS not receiving notice of the claims’ bar date for governmental entities. Discussing the split of authority on whether lack of notice of the case filing permits allowance, the court found justification for allowance, reasoning that the claims bar date is not absolute when there is no notice to the creditor, since the Code assumes that the creditor actually received notice. Fundamental fairness questions prevailed, and denial of IRS’s claim would adversely . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Disability and Distress: The Effect of Disability Programs on Financial Outcomes – A Study

Edward C. Boltz

April 27, 2025

This study looks at the correlation between receipt of SSDI and bankruptcy, foreclosure, eviction and home sale.

Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge

The Academy

March 20, 2022

Chris Hawkins was sworn in as a bankruptcy judge for the Middle District of Alabama on March 14, 2022, succeeding Judge William R. Sawyer. Before his appointment, Chris was a partner at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, where he focused exclusively on bankruptcy and insolvency matters. For over twenty years, he represented debtors and creditors in out-of-court restructurings, commercial and...

Practice Tip from The Honorable Meredith Jury (Ret.)

M. Jonathan Hayes

February 1, 2026

Judge Jury gives a thoughtful answer to Attorney Hayes question: “My client is adamant that I appeal but I'm afraid the judge will be mad at me. Do you have a comfort blanket I might use to quell my fears?”

Members

In re Evans: Disgorging Chapter 13 Trustee Fees in Cases Dismissed Prior to Confirmation

March 15, 2020

By Jen Grondahl Lee, Jen Lee Law, Inc. (San Ramon, CA) When is a collected fee not a collected fee? When the statutes authorizing payment to the standing Chapter 13 trustee do not provide clear guidance on when that fee is paid and/or earned. The most recent case on this issue is In re Evans (Bankr. Idaho 2020).1 In a...

Members

When the Duty to Provide Tax Returns Collides with Confidentiality

Michael B. Joseph

February 6, 2022

Bankruptcy Code Section 521(e)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) provides that a debtor must supply tax returns to the trustee in a chapter 7 or 13 case, and to a creditor who timely requests such copy. Must the debtor provide copies that contain personal identifying information such as names, addresses and social security numbers of dependents including minor children? Or a redacted version...

Members

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC

Lawrence R. Ahern, III

May 14, 2023

Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during the past year.One new rule and amendments to 16 rules took effect December 1, 2022. Many reflected changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), and had been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.

Members

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2002: Who Gives Notice?

The Academy

July 19, 2026

The linked chart is from the Bankruptcy Court in the District of Minnesota, describing Who Gives Notice Under the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 2002. See www.mnb.uscourts.gov/attorney-procedures

The Kill Switch and The Stay

July 11, 2021

Kara K. Gendron, Esquire, Mott & Gendron Law (Harrisburg, PA) A “kill switch” is a device which can be used to disable a machine or program. They have been used for years in a myriad of safety measures, such as shutting down machinery in the event of an emergency, or to prevent the theft of a machine or data. Some...

Members

Post-Petition Equity in Chapter 13 – Who Gets The $$$

Thomas D. DeCarlo

October 2, 2022

So, what happens to post-petition appreciation of assets during a Chapter 13? Does the Debtor get to keep the money? Or does the Chapter 13 Trustee get it for the benefit of creditors? That was the question for the Court in In re Klein, 2022 WL 3902822 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2022). The question in Klein is a bit different than...

Members

Critical Case Comment – 3002.1 and Reverse Mortgages

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

January 23, 2022

Requirements and remedies in Rule 3002.1 apply to reverse mortgages as well as conventional mortgages; while discharge of Chapter 13 plan does not discharge a mortgage obligation treated pursuant to § 1325(b)(5), the court may prohibit prospective use of a nondisclosed obligation as grounds for a default. (Waites) In re Legare-Doctor, 2021 WL 5712149 (Bankr. D. S.C. Dec. 1, 2021)...

Members

From the Editor – Claims

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or sign in below:

Related Articles

Disability and Distress: The Effect of Disability Programs on Financial Outcomes – A Study

Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge

Practice Tip from The Honorable Meredith Jury (Ret.)

In re Evans: Disgorging Chapter 13 Trustee Fees in Cases Dismissed Prior to Confirmation

When the Duty to Provide Tax Returns Collides with Confidentiality

2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2002: Who Gives Notice?

The Kill Switch and The Stay

Post-Petition Equity in Chapter 13 – Who Gets The $$$

Critical Case Comment – 3002.1 and Reverse Mortgages

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: