A reverse mortgage, having fallen due as a result of the death of the borrower, is not protected from modification by the borrower’s heirs by virtue of § 1322(c)(2). (Halfenger) In re Sandoval, 2022 WL 982182 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. March 31, 2022) Case Summary Juan Sandoval filed Chapter 13 and proposed a plan which dealt with his principal asset, a...
From the Editor’s Desk – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Chapter 7 debtor lacked standing to appeal from order finding no standing to seek claim disallowance. The debtor did not demonstrate “person aggrieved” standing to appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order that she lacked standing to sue for disallowance of a claim. It was a no-asset case, and the debtor did not show financial interest in the claim’s allowance, since she did not show a surplus of assets that would allow distribution to her. Khan v. Regions Bank (In re Khan), ___ Fed.Appx . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Serendipity, a Tribute to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer
Think Beyond The Means Test
Tax Projections and the Means Test – Part II
The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 1 of 4
The Bankruptcy Moot Court Experience – Duberstein 2019
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 3 Rules Related to SBRA (Continued)
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Judicial Estoppel
Critical Case Comment– Reverse Mortgage May be Modified
Critical Case Comment – Prime vs. Riskless Treasury Rate
Critical Case Comment – Free Parking