The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor’s Desk – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
FDCPA claim may arise from communication to debtor. After the Chapter 7 case was filed, a law firm, acting on behalf of a creditor, sent a letter to the debtor’s counsel suggesting settlement to prevent the creditor pursuing a dischargeability proceeding. A Rule 2004 examination was scheduled but quashed by the bankruptcy court because of defective issuance and service. The Third Circuit held that the letter and notice of Rule 2004 examination were “communications” within the meaning of the FDCPA, constituting attempts to collect a credit card debt. The court . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Meet One of Our Newest Trustees
List It or Lose It: When Actual Knowledge Isn’t Enough
Meet a New Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
The Effect of “Success” (or the Lack of It) on Attorneys’ Fees – Part 1: Judicial and Legislative Background
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 2 Rules Related to SBRA
Small Business Reorganization Postscript 2
Meet A New Twofer Trustee
Critical Case Comment – What About a Zero Value Junior Lien?
Surprise Sanctions: Case Highlights Critical Need for Due Process in Fee Reductions