By C. Kenneth Still, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Retired (1968-2015) January 2, 1968, my first day as Trustee for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern and Winchester Divisions. I really didn’t know what I was doing or why I wanted the appointment. But there I was, duly appointed and ready to go but where...
From the Editor’s Desk – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
FDCPA claim may arise from communication to debtor. After the Chapter 7 case was filed, a law firm, acting on behalf of a creditor, sent a letter to the debtor’s counsel suggesting settlement to prevent the creditor pursuing a dischargeability proceeding. A Rule 2004 examination was scheduled but quashed by the bankruptcy court because of defective issuance and service. The Third Circuit held that the letter and notice of Rule 2004 examination were “communications” within the meaning of the FDCPA, constituting attempts to collect a credit card debt. The court . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Why Address Formatting Is So Important for Jurisdiction
New Judge Appointed
Don’t Be Dismissive – Rule 41
Courts are Expanding the Protections of Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1
All Taxpayers Should Plan Ahead for Natural Disasters
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Remedies for Discharge Violation
Ask Ms. Ps and Qs
Critical Case Comment
Memories of a Chapter XIII Trustee
Special Counsel 101: Getting Paid and Protecting Clients