By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) After the pandemic, when the economy lurches back into motion, bankruptcy lawyers will confront a clutch of troubled Chapter 13 cases. In the face of disruption, distress, and the unknown, we'll be called on to guide clients forward, in one direction or another. Let's review the questions we'll need to answer in order...
From the Editor’s Desk – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
FDCPA claim may arise from communication to debtor. After the Chapter 7 case was filed, a law firm, acting on behalf of a creditor, sent a letter to the debtor’s counsel suggesting settlement to prevent the creditor pursuing a dischargeability proceeding. A Rule 2004 examination was scheduled but quashed by the bankruptcy court because of defective issuance and service. The Third Circuit held that the letter and notice of Rule 2004 examination were “communications” within the meaning of the FDCPA, constituting attempts to collect a credit card debt. The court . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Five Things Trustees Should Know About the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019
Between the 1st and the 15th: Is Mortgage Current?
The Kill Switch and The Stay
There is NO MORE Form 1040A or 1040EZ – Six New Schedules Some Taxpayers Will File with New Form 1040
Analyzing the Troubled Chapter 13 During COVID19
Passing of Judge – District of New Mexico
The Dollar Dance: Boosting Deductions in Bankruptcy’s Means Test
Bankruptcy Court Broadly Interprets “Engaged in Business” Requirement for Subchapter V Eligibility
Passing of Sitting Chief Judge
More Questions (and Maybe Answers) from the Means Test Expenses Webinar