In re Gonzalez, No. 11-23183-BKC-LMI, 2012 WL 2974813, at *3–*5 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. July 20, 2012) (Isicoff)

BAPCPA did not upset the holding in Florida Department of Revenue v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez), No. 09-13222, 2010 WL 597224 (11th Cir. Feb. 22, 2010) (unpublished) (Dubina, Pryor, Anderson): State of Florida is in contempt for violating confirmation order by intercepting a payment to the debtor to collect a child support arrearage that was provided for through the plan. Confirmed plan included payment of ongoing child support and payment to cure a $2,400 child support arrearage. After confirmation, the State of Florida intercepted a travel reimbursement check from the Department of Treasury to the debtor. Debtor brought contempt action for violation of the confirmation order. “[T]he decision of the DOR to allow the interception of the expense reimbursement as a method for payment of the arrearage was contrary to the express provisions of the Debtor’s Plan, which provides that the arrearage of $2,400 will be paid in full . . . . [T]he changes in BAPCPA do not change the Rodriguez holding. . . . [E]ven if an action taken by the DOR in connection with its enforcement obligations is not a violation of the automatic stay, it may, nonetheless, be a violation of a confirmation order. . . . This Court agrees with Rodriguez that both domestic support creditors and debtors are bound by the terms of a chapter 13 plan . . . . [S]o long as the Debtor is meeting his obligations under the Plan, the DOR may not take any action inconsistent with the Plan. . . . [T]he DOR [is] in contempt for violating this Court’s Confirmation Order. . . . [T]he Debtor is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs.”

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

October 31, 2021
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) Rule 3002.1 gives the Bankruptcy Court authority to impose sanctions, including punitive sanctions, as part of the rules-granted authority to award “other appropriate relief.” (Rodriguez) Blanco v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC (In re Blanco), 2021 WL 4190170 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. September 14, 2021) Case...
September 22, 2019
By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) I wrote earlier about calculating the projected income tax deduction on the means test when the year of filing situation looks much like last year. But what if things aren't the same year over year? Your job as a bankruptcy attorney becomes more complicated. It's suddenly more than figuring the tax refund or...
February 21, 2021
By William J. Purdy III (Soquel, CA) Got an EDD tax form 1099 but no benefits? At this moment, POTENTIALLY hundreds of thousands of California taxpayers are enjoying the ghastly experience of receiving a Form 1099G courtesy of the California EDD for unemployment benefits the taxpayer never received. The problem is not confined to California; it’s so prevalent, the IRS...
June 2, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee If a Chapter 13 debtor does not list a creditor on the creditor matrix when filing the petition and makes no effort to provide supplemental notice to the creditor, the provisions of Rule 3002 allow the extension of time for the creditor to file a...
August 25, 2019
On 8/22/19 the IRSe and its Security Summit partners warned taxpayers and tax professionals about a new IRS impersonation scam campaign spreading nationally on email. Remember: the IRS does not send unsolicited emails and never emails taxpayers about the status of refunds. The IRS detected this new scam as taxpayers began notifying [email protected] about unsolicited emails from IRS imposters. The...
March 22, 2020
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Click here for Part I Click here for Part II Part III - Description of Collateral Introduction The . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join Now Or Sign In Below: Username or Email Password Remember me...
November 22, 2020
By Phil Lamos, Chief Legal Counsel, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee Lauren A. Helbling (Cleveland, OH) Bankruptcy Rule 2002(a)(5) directs that 21 days’ notice must be given of the “time fixed to accept or reject a proposed modification of a [Chapter 13] plan.” But to whom must notice be given? Specifically, which creditors need to be given notice? This...
August 20, 2023
What are the consequences of a secured lender’s failure to comply with R. 3002.1 in a prior case when the debtor files again? Significant, it seems. . . . since their attorney said he “didn’t see the need” to do so. [Can you guess, now, how this comes out?]
June 21, 2020
By Academy Staff The Automatic Stay is one of the most fundamental aspects of the Bankruptcy Code, providing a Chapter 7 Trustee “breathing room” to investigate Debtor’s financial affairs; and providing Debtors in Chapter 13 time to formulate and confirm a Chapter 13 Plan without facing the imminent loss of assets. Equally important, most Courts have concluded that actions in...
May 17, 2020
By Marsha M. Brown, Staff Attorney to Chapter 13 Trustee Douglas W. Neway (Jacksonville, FL) We talk about it daily - emailing issues back and forth as to what is reasonable and what is not. Should every Court have a basic reasonable fee structure or should every attorney be required to file an application to prove the reasonableness of his/her...

Looking to Become a Member? offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.


These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: