In re Gonzalez, No. 11-23183-BKC-LMI, 2012 WL 2974813, at *3–*5 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. July 20, 2012) (Isicoff)

BAPCPA did not upset the holding in Florida Department of Revenue v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez), No. 09-13222, 2010 WL 597224 (11th Cir. Feb. 22, 2010) (unpublished) (Dubina, Pryor, Anderson): State of Florida is in contempt for violating confirmation order by intercepting a payment to the debtor to collect a child support arrearage that was provided for through the plan. Confirmed plan included payment of ongoing child support and payment to cure a $2,400 child support arrearage. After confirmation, the State of Florida intercepted a travel reimbursement check from the Department of Treasury to the debtor. Debtor brought contempt action for violation of the confirmation order. “[T]he decision of the DOR to allow the interception of the expense reimbursement as a method for payment of the arrearage was contrary to the express provisions of the Debtor’s Plan, which provides that the arrearage of $2,400 will be paid in full . . . . [T]he changes in BAPCPA do not change the Rodriguez holding. . . . [E]ven if an action taken by the DOR in connection with its enforcement obligations is not a violation of the automatic stay, it may, nonetheless, be a violation of a confirmation order. . . . This Court agrees with Rodriguez that both domestic support creditors and debtors are bound by the terms of a chapter 13 plan . . . . [S]o long as the Debtor is meeting his obligations under the Plan, the DOR may not take any action inconsistent with the Plan. . . . [T]he DOR [is] in contempt for violating this Court’s Confirmation Order. . . . [T]he Debtor is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs.”

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

May 12, 2019
Small business owners should keep good records. This applies to all businesses, whether they have a couple dozen employees or just a few. Whether they install software or make soft-serve. Whether they cut hair or cut lawns. Keeping good records is an important part of running a successful business. Here are some questions and answers to help business owners understand...
January 19, 2020
By Craig Shopneck, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern District of Ohio Retired It was many months ago when Mike Joseph asked, if, as a retired trustee, would I be interested in writing an article for the NACTT Academy. This may seem like a rather straightforward task but before putting pen to paper I needed time to reflect not...
Members
NBR cropped 2
May 14, 2023
Dear Readers: Want to know why your 1L Civ Pro course is your best friend when it comes to “undue hardship” cases?  Because burdens of proof matter.  (They matter in other cases, too, but I’m in love with the case of Love v. U.S. Dept. of Education (In re Love), Case No. 19-20532-C-7, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern...
Members
moran_cathy
January 23, 2022
The no man's land between the mortgage due date and late payment is a persistent trouble spot for Chapter 13 practitioners. Are there arrears when the case is filed during the grace period and the payment made before it was late? In Borre, Judge Ronald Sargis of ED CA said no. He held that the payment was not in default...
Members
November 1, 2020
From their spring edition of The Quarterly our friends at NACTT have shared a timely piece from creditor attorney Thomas Humphries. _____________________ Thomas Humphries is an attorney with the firm of Sirote & Permutt, PC in Birmingham Alabama. Thomas represents the mortgage banking industry and various creditors in bankruptcy proceedings throughout the State of Alabama. Thomas’s practice includes the defense...
Members
February 16, 2020
By Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This series has focused on the four bankruptcy-related bills that were enacted during the 116th Congress and signed into law on August 23, 2019. One bill, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA), will be effective February 19, 2020. It appears in its entirety in Appendix B to...
Members
March 31, 2019
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Lien Modification - Modification of mortgage on mixed-use property. Reviewing the split of authority on whether a Chapter 13 debtor may modify a mortgage on property used for both business and residential purposes and when the use determination is made, the bankruptcy court adopted the filing date as the appropriate time...
Members
rmichaelsmith
October 23, 2022
The recent push for student loan forgiveness has been met with increasing opposition. The rationales for not providing a generally applicable path for student loan forgiveness or cancellation have included arguments based upon imagined unfairness to those previously able to pay off their loans, which seems to be both short-sighted, as well as a “red herring” argument. It does not...
February 2, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Class action certification on predominance. The Eleventh Circuit remanded, finding that the District Court had abused its discretion in refusing to certify a class on a predominance theory for former debtors who had obtained discharge of personal liability on residential mortgages and who asserted violations of the FDCPA by a loan servicer. The...
Members
ahern_larry_regular
March 20, 2022
"Finality" in Bankruptcy When is an order within a bankruptcy case "final"? When must a party to the proceeding appeal within 14 days? When may a party either seek interlocutory review or sit back and wait until something more occurs to make the order final? Final orders are appealable. In civil actions, this is a relatively easy proposition to apply...
Members