The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: Taylor v. Deangelis
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of Tennessee
Taylor v. Deangelis, 2011 WL 3692440 (3th Cir, Aug. 24, 2011) (Fuentes)
A creditor’s attorney, seeking relief from the automatic stay and opposing an application to disallow a claim, with pleadings containing “facts” derived from the NewTrak system but who failed to verify the information with the creditor, would be subject to sanctions under Rule 9011.
Case Summary
The Taylors filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy in September 2009, listing HSBC as their mortgage creditor. HSBC filed a proof . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice – Part VI
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13© – Part 6 of 6
Social Media Scams: Con Artists Target the Vulnerable
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
What A Bankruptcy Lawyer Is Thankful For
When $400 Emergency Pushes You Over the Edge
Tax Tips for Taxpayers to Consider When Selling Their Home
Critical Case Comment
Critical Case Comment – Pigs Get Fat/Hogs Get Slaughtered
From the Editor – Fair Debt Collection Practices Act