By Hank Hildebrand
In re Veal, 2011 WL 2304200 (9th Cir BAP, June 10, 2011) (Markell, Kirscher, Jury)
An entity filing a proof of claim secured by a mortgage must establish requisite standing to pursue the proof of claim under both a prudential standing rule and Rule 7017; an entity seeking relief from the automatic stay must demonstrate that they are the true party in interest.
In August 2006, Howard and Shelli Veal executed a note payable to GSF Mortgage Corporation. This note was secured by their residence and the . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below: