By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) Have I got a story for you. A rousing tale of schedules, hearings, frustrations, and ultimately fortunes, traceable to a good story in the fee application. Maybe that's a bit overblown, but I'm telling this story with a purpose. Good stories lead to fair compensation for bankruptcy attorneys. Fee applications aren't hard Filing...
Critical Case Comment – United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010)
Where a student loan creditor received notice of the terms of a debtor’s Chapter 13 plan that provided for a partial discharge of the student loan, Rule 60(b)(4) relief was not available and the confirmation order would be binding on the creditor.
Summary of the Case
Between 1988 and 1989, Francisco Espinosa obtained several student loans, federally . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Personal Injury Attorney’s Duty of Reasonable Inquiry of a Client’s Bankruptcy
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Recommendations Related to Exemptions
Critical Case Comment – Don’t File a Individual Chapter 13 If the Assets Are Owned by an LLC; It Will Cost You – BIG
From the Editor – Plan Modification
How to Present an Effective Summary Judgment Motion
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Tell the Story
Laudable, Shortsighted, and Vague: The CDC’s Eviction Moratorium