By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) Have I got a story for you. A rousing tale of schedules, hearings, frustrations, and ultimately fortunes, traceable to a good story in the fee application. Maybe that's a bit overblown, but I'm telling this story with a purpose. Good stories lead to fair compensation for bankruptcy attorneys. Fee applications aren't hard Filing...
Critical Case Comment – United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 2010 WL 1027825 (U.S. S.Ct. March 23, 2010)
Where a student loan creditor received notice of the terms of a debtor’s Chapter 13 plan that provided for a partial discharge of the student loan, Rule 60(b)(4) relief was not available and the confirmation order would be binding on the creditor.
Summary of the Case
Between 1988 and 1989, Francisco Espinosa obtained several student loans, federally . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or sign in below:
Related Articles
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act
FDIC and OCC Proposals Threaten Expansion of Predatory Lending
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
From the Editor
Tell the Story
FFIEC Issues Statement on Examination Principles Related to Valuation Discrimination and Bias in Residential Lending
Finding Your Village: An Introductory Guide to Bringing Fair Credit Reporting Act Claims for Clients Post-Bankruptcy
Judge to Retire
Applying the Principles of “Lady Justice”
Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??