The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
In re Cannella, No. 14-21398, 2015 WL 1208679 (Bankr. D. Kan., Aug. 12, 2014) (Berger). In performing the hypothetical liquidation analysis of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4), Chapter 13 attorney’s fees are deducted as a priority claim before estimating the return to non-priority unsecured creditors.
Factual Summary
On the petition date, the Debtors held $3,010 in cash, but their plan proposed a $0.00 return to unsecured creditors. The Trustee objected to confirmation under the best-interests-of . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Vesting of Property in the Debtor Cuts Off Creditor’s Rights, Ninth Circuit Says
Critical Case Comment – It’s All in the Proof
Analyzing the Troubled Chapter 13 During COVID19
Critical Case Comment – Pro Se Debtor Sanctioned
All Taxpayers Should Plan Ahead for Natural Disasters
Critical Case Comment – Debtor Bears Burden of Proof to Be Ones Own Disbursing Agent
Five More Things Debtors Should Know About the SBRA of 2019
Critical Case Comment – 3002.1 and Reverse Mortgages
Claims Secured by Personal Property
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Introduction