The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – Creditor Not Required to Dismiss Prepetition Nonbankruptcy Action
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville)
The automatic stay does not require a creditor pursuing a prepetition nonbankruptcy court action to dismiss that action once a bankruptcy case is filed; requesting continuances and attending status conferences do not constitute “continuation” of the prepetition action for purposes of the automatic stay. (Brand) Perryman v. Poggetto (In re Perryman), 2021 WL 4742673 (9th Cir. BAP October 8, 2021)
Case Summary
Karen Dal Poggetto sought a dissolution of marriage from Jerome Perryman in 2017. The parties reached a marital . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix B
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
Bankruptcy Courts Grapple with the “COVID-19 Discharge” – Appendix A
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 10 Once Again: The Supreme Court Hands Down a Procedure Rule in Dupree v. Younger
Honorable Kevin R. Anderson, U.S. Bankruptcy Court District of Utah
Meet a New Trustee
Cyber Security – You Are The Weakest Link
From the Editor – Claims
Critical Case Comment – Sec. 328 vs. Sec. 327 Not Exactly a Smack Down
Substantial Contribution Claims