The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Property of Estate
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor could redeem property sold at prepetition tax sale. Under Pennsylvania law, tax sale purchaser had inchoate, defeasible title, subject to debtor’s right to redeem, and purchaser essentially held secured claim that could be treated by redemption over course of plan. In re Pittman, 549 B.R. 614 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2016). Accord In re Gonzales, 2016 WL 2944281 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2016). See also In re Washington, ________B.R.________, 2016 WL 3398448 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2016) (similar . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – Topping Off the Risk Factor
From the Other Side
CFPB Releases Report on Debt Settlements and Credit Counseling
Escrow 101 – Part 1 of 3
Critical Case Comment – No POC, No Money
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Student Loans – Suggested Statutory Changes
“Stripping” Residential Mortgages and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b) – Part 2 Eleven Eleven What?
Arbitration in Bankruptcy: Reading Opinions & Tea Leaves in Recent Supreme Court & Lower Court Actions Part IV
Critical Case Comment – A Mixed Bag of Inheritance