By Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) The Seventh Circuit thought that it had finished dealing with the intersection of cars, fines, Chapter 13, and the City of Chicago when it rendered its decision earlier in 2019 in “Steenes I.” In re Steenes, 918 F.3d 554 . Alas, it was not to be,...
From the Editor – Property of Estate
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor could redeem property sold at prepetition tax sale. Under Pennsylvania law, tax sale purchaser had inchoate, defeasible title, subject to debtor’s right to redeem, and purchaser essentially held secured claim that could be treated by redemption over course of plan. In re Pittman, 549 B.R. 614 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2016). Accord In re Gonzales, 2016 WL 2944281 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2016). See also In re Washington, ________B.R.________, 2016 WL 3398448 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2016) (similar . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Cars, Fines, and Chapter 13 in the Windy City
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – What Does It Mean to Surrender?
Critical Case Comment – 10th Circuit Says No Default Cures After Month 60
A Few of Our Favorite (Chapter 13) Things
Meet One of Our Newest Trustees
IRS Updates Guidance for Deductible Business, Charitable, Medical and Moving Expenses
Critical Case Comment – No Mulligans for Gardners
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act
Fourth Circuit Overrules Own Precedent, Holds Certain Primary Residence Claims Can be Crammed Down in Chapter 13 Bankruptcies
Assumption of Auto Lease in Chapter 7 Requires No Court Approval Says the 9th Circuit: In re Bobka