The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee
In re Nachon-Torres, 520 B.R. 306 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. November 24, 2014) (Isicoff): Modification of a confirmed Chapter 13 plan under § 1329 can only be effected based upon changes in the debtor’s circumstances which were not known or not virtually certain; when a plan is modified, the “best interest of creditors test” is applicable as of the date of the modified plan.
Case Summary
Judge Isicoff considered several Chapter 13 cases where debtors had sought to modify . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part IV
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – A Chapter 7 Trustee’s Sale of Encumbered Property
Practice Pointers for Arguing Motions
Who Gets the Trustee’s Fee and When?
Tracking Down the Illusive Mortgage Interest Deduction
Meet the First Black Woman to Serve as Chief Judge for Federal Bankruptcy Court in Cleveland
Don’t Be Dismissive – Rule 41
In the Trenches: Secrets to Settlement – Competency in the Courtroom Part 3 of 3
Sanctions in South Carolina
Fourth Circuit: Brittner v. Beach Anesthesia