From the Editor

From the Editor – Eligibility

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Debt limits are not jurisdictional and are subject to waiver. In a case filed in 2010, then dismissed for failure to file a plan but reinstated, the bankruptcy court heard evidence in 2012 on a creditor’s motion to dismiss for lack of eligibility. By the time the creditor filed its motion to dismiss, asserting that the debtors exceeded the unsecured limit, the debtors had maintained plan payments for two years, and the creditor had not moved to dismiss when it filed its plan objection. Finding that a majority . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Duty to Disclose Substantial and Unanticipated Changes in Debtor’s Financial Condition

Angela M. Scolforo

December 11, 2022

In the case of In re Ilyev, 17-12987-KHK (Bankr. E.D. VA July 26, 2022), Judge Kenney granted the Chapter 13 Trustee’s motion to modify the plan to require the Debtor to repay some of the $29,250 of disposable income he retained by not making his mortgage payments during an 18-month Covid forbearance. The Debtor never disclosed to the Trustee, or...

Members

Evidentiary Issues Arising from Attempts to Prove Alleged “Facts” Stated in The Monster Mash

October 27, 2019

By Alexander Schmidt1, Law Clerk, and The Honorable John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Toledo) You have never heard – or seen – the Monster Mash. What have you heard, is a song ABOUT the Monster Mash. Let that sink in for a minute. Inevitably, that leads to the obvious question: What facts...

Members

Sub V Update

Paul W. Bonapfel

April 14, 2024

Many of you are familiar with the extensive outline on Sub Chapter V that the Honorable Paul W. Bonapfel, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, produces. This is a FREE resource and is freshly updated!! Thank you Judge Bonapfel!

April 7, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Attorney Fees - Chapter 13 debtor’s attorney not entitled to recovery under § 330 of fees that were incurred in defending prior attorneys’ sanctions motion. The debtor’s prior attorneys had sought to impose sanctions on the current attorney, and that attorney successfully defended against sanctions. However, the fees incurred by the...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

September 24, 2023

In calculating projected disposable income, 13 debtor may deduct entire mortgage payment notwithstanding amount exceeds the housing allowance as established by the IRS Financial Standards Allowance.

Members

Critical Case Comment – Service Counts

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 2, 2022

Debtor’s filing application to extend or impose the automatic stay must comply with the service requirements of Rule 7004 as to all creditors or the stay cannot be imposed or extended. (Johnson) In re Hardy, 2022 WL 1196963 (C.D. Cal. April 21, 2022) Case Summary Kimberly Hardy had a long history in consumer bankruptcy. She had filed eight cases, including...

Members

U.S. Trustee Fee Unconstitutional

The Honorable William Houston Brown

June 12, 2022

On June 6, the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in Siegel v. Fitzgerald1 held that the increase in U.S. Trustee fees in Chapter 11 cases violated the uniformity requirement of the Constitution’s Bankruptcy Clause,2 because the fee increase in 2017 only applied to in the U.S. Trustee districts and didn’t apply to the Bankruptcy Administrator districts in Alabama and North Carolina....

What A Bankruptcy Lawyer Is Thankful For

Cathy Moran

November 19, 2023

On Thanksgiving, I’m mindful of how precious the American approach to insolvency is.

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 2 of 4

June 21, 2020

By Anthony J. Gomez, CPA, former extern to the Honorable John P. Gustafson, Northern District of Ohio at Toledo III. Applying the Hanging Paragraph a. Application of the Hanging Paragraph – Timing of Debt In order for the hanging paragraph to apply, the debt must be secured by a purchase money security interest (“PMSI”) in either: 1) a motor vehicle...

Members

Meet a New AND Newish Trustee

The Academy

March 27, 2022

Krista M. Preuss was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Southern District of New York on February 1, 2018. She succeeded Jeffrey Sapir after his retirement. On October 1, 2021, she was appointed as the Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of New York, succeeding Marianne DeRosa upon her retirement. Yep, two trusteeships. Can you...

From the Editor – Eligibility

Link to Post:

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

Related Articles

Duty to Disclose Substantial and Unanticipated Changes in Debtor’s Financial Condition

Evidentiary Issues Arising from Attempts to Prove Alleged “Facts” Stated in The Monster Mash

Sub V Update

From the Editor

Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy

Critical Case Comment – Service Counts

U.S. Trustee Fee Unconstitutional

What A Bankruptcy Lawyer Is Thankful For

The Hanging Paragraph – Hanging on Every Word Part 2 of 4

Meet a New AND Newish Trustee

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: