The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
Meyer v. Scholz (In re Scholz), 699 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. Nov. 15, 2012) (Watford)
An anti-anticipation clause in a governmental or private retirement plan or trust does not exclude such income from the calculation of current monthly income and projected disposable income under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b).
Case Summary
The debtor was a railroad retiree and received $3,600 per month under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA). Railroad employees do not participate in Social Security but are covered by . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules
A Sappy Farewell to Jeff Kellner as the Dayton Chapter 13 Trustee
Progeny of Taggart: In re Gravel and Newrez, LLC v. Beckhart
Chris Hawkins Appointed Judge
Chapter 13 Saves the World!
Critical Case Comment
Form 1099G – How to Fight Back Against Scams
Is 1328(i) Ultimately Terrible for Debtors?
Meet a Newish Trustee
Federal District Court Affirms Decision that Residential Loan Modification Does Not Alter Lien Priority in Pennsylvania