The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – eCast Settlement Corporation v. Washburn (In re Washburn), 08-2023/08-2024 (8th Cir. August 28, 2009) (Melloy)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
eCast Settlement Corporation v. Washburn (In re Washburn), 08-2023/08-2024 (8th Cir. August 28, 2009) (Melloy)
A Chapter 13 debtor with above-median income is permitted to claim a vehicle ownership expense for a vehicle that the debtor owns outright, without encumbrance.
Summary of the Case
Robert Washburn owned a motor vehicle that was not encumbered with a debt payment. He calculated his projected disposable income by deducting from his income $471 per . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
One Woman’s Opinion
Objections to Claims: Two of These Creditors Are Not Like the Others [1]
Thoughts on the Law: “None of My Business” Or “CU Later”? – Does Refusing to Do Business with a Debtor Violate the Automatic Stay?
When (or Not) Is the Best Interests of Creditors Test Applicable in a Modified Plan?
Tips and Traps: Issuing A Subpoena for Bank Records
Fourth Circuit: Brittner v. Beach Anesthesia
Undersecured Short-Term Mortgages May be Crammed Down
New Federal Guidance on Discharging Student Loans in Bankruptcy Is a Game Changer
Chapter 13 Discharge Expanded by COVID Relief Legislation
City of Chicago v. Fulton And the Turnover Conundrum