The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
CRITICAL CASE COMMENT: In re Hargis
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Middle District of Tennessee
In re Hargis, 2011 WL 1651235 (Bank. Utah, May 3, 2011) (Marker)
While above-median income Chapter 13 debtors are not automatically entitled to take a $200 per month additional operating expense for an old motor vehicle, such debtors may claim an additional vehicle operating expense they actually incur for operating an older vehicle.
Case Summary
The Debtors were above-median income and filed a Chapter 13 petition that calculated their projected disposable income in accordance with Form 22C. The Debtors . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Passing of Retired Ohio Judge
Here’s What Taxpayers Should Consider When Determining If They Need to File
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 1 of 2
Two Final Observations about the SBRA – Part IX
Chapter 13 No-Look Fees – Additional Thoughts
Lenders Can’t Hide from Consequences of Misapplication of Mortgage Payments
Meet an AO Trustee
Judicial Year in Review 2021: Part 3 – Selected Cases under Parts IV-VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Postpetition Borrowing by a Consumer Debtor in Chapter 13 – Part 2 of 2
Critical Case Comment–84 Months: Lifesaver or Anchor?