The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Kevin R. Anderson, Chapter 13 Trustee for the District of Utah
In re Cannella, No. 14-21398, 2015 WL 1208679 (Bankr. D. Kan., Aug. 12, 2014) (Berger). In performing the hypothetical liquidation analysis of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(4), Chapter 13 attorney’s fees are deducted as a priority claim before estimating the return to non-priority unsecured creditors.
Factual Summary
On the petition date, the Debtors held $3,010 in cash, but their plan proposed a $0.00 return to unsecured creditors. The Trustee objected to confirmation under the best-interests-of . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
Supreme Court Revisits Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy: Comment on Ritzen and Review of “Finality”
Delaware Trustee Michael Joseph to Retire
What About Conditional Confirmation?
Meet a Brand Spankin’ New Trustee
TMI: Too Much Information
Critical Case Comment
Critical Case Comment – How Much Is It Worth – Then/Now?
Declining Cases and Increasing Judicial Vacancies
In re Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), pet. for cert. granted, Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 2023 WL 6780372, (U.S., October 13, 2023).