The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Dismissal
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Undistributed funds returned to debtor upon dismissal. Under § 1327(b)’s vesting requirement, unless a confirmed plan provides otherwise, any undistributed funds held by the trustee at dismissal of the case must be returned to the debtor. Although not necessary to rely on § 347(b)(3), the conclusion on effect of vesting at confirmation was consistent with that section and case law interpreting it. In re Hernandez, _________B.R._________, 2020 WL 773475 (Bankr. D. Conn. Jan. 17, 2020). See also In re Evans, _________B.R._________, 2020 WL . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Fond Farewell to Danny O’Brien
Meet the New Trustee
A Fond Farewell to 007 – Frank M. Pees
Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”
Members of the Armed Forces Are Entitled to Certain Tax Benefits
Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 6 Finality Versus a Residential Mortgagee: Espinosa and Nobelman Clash in the Eleventh Circuit
Critical Case Comment – Fourth Circuit Says Easy-Peasy
More Questions on the Mortgage Interest Deduction
Critical Case Comment