The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Nashville, TN
Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Pulley (In re Pulley), 532 B.R. 12 (E.D. Va. April 30, 2015) (Hudson)
A student loan creditor is not estopped or otherwise precluded from collecting on a student loan obligation after the debtor receives a discharge in a Chapter 13 case where the student loan creditor had abandoned its claim and returned disbursed funds to the trustee.
Case Summary
Jenny Pulley filed a Chapter 13 petition in December of 2006 proposing to repay creditors over a sixty month . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 2
The Student Loan Solution
The Government Shutdown and Chapter 13 Plan Arrearages – What Do We Do Now?
Comparison of Annual Change in Chapter 13 Case Filings During the Beginnings of the 2008 and the 2020 Recessions
Fourth Circuit Overrules Own Precedent, Holds Certain Primary Residence Claims Can be Crammed Down in Chapter 13 Bankruptcies
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9
Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”
Critical Case Comment – Playing the System – Good or Bad Thing??