The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Lien Stripping
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Third mortgage could be stripped in plan. Agreeing with other circuit decisions, the Eighth Circuit held that a wholly unsecured third mortgage on the debtor’s principal residence could be modified and stripped. Section 506(a)(1) determines the extent to which a lien is secured, and § 1322(b)(2) does not prevent modification when there is no value to support the mortgage lien. Nobelman dealt with partially secured liens, and “the dividing line drawn by § 1322(b)(2) runs between the lienholder whose security interest in . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – A Chapter 7 Trustee’s Sale of Encumbered Property
Meet an AO Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Present Value and Attorney’s Fees
The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part 3
In re Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 60 F.4th 73 (4th Cir. 2023), pet. for cert. granted, Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., 2023 WL 6780372, (U.S., October 13, 2023).
Tax Tips for Taxpayers to Consider When Selling Their Home
Complete Termination of The Automatic Stay Under §362(c)(3)(A) According to the First Circuit
Rule 3002.1 Does Not Justify Punitive Sanctions
From the Editor – Claims