From the Editor – Lien Stripping • NACTT Academy

From the Editor – Lien Stripping

By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)

Court could not strip lien on tenancy by entirety. In Chapter 13 filed by only one spouse, the debtor could not strip off lien with no value on property owned as tenants by entirety. The bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to modify a lienholder’s rights as to the non-debtor’s property interest. Alvarez v. Grigsby (In re Alvarez), 733 F.3d 136 (4th Cir. 2013).

_______________________________

The Honorable William Houston Brown retired in 2006 as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western District of Tennessee . . .

It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.

Or Sign In Below:

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Georgia Attorney Sanctioned in Debtor’s Seventh Chapter 13 Case

M. Jonathan Hayes

September 8, 2024

Apparently, seventh time’s the harm. In this case, aggressive lawyering’ crosses the line.

Members

Max’s Knowledge Nugget

Max Gardner

November 13, 2022

Question: May a servicer charge to generate a payoff quote? Answer: 1026.36(c)(3) Payoff statements. In connection with a consumer credit transaction secured by a consumer's dwelling, a creditor, assignee or servicer, as applicable, must provide an accurate statement of the total outstanding balance that would be required to pay the consumer's obligation in full as of a specified date. The...

Members

New Trustee Named

The Academy

September 10, 2023

Andrew B. Finberg has been appointed as a Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the District of New Jersey. Finberg is picking up the mantle left by happily retiring Isabel Balboa.

Escrow 102 – Part 4 of 4

October 17, 2021

By Michael J. McCormick, Esq., McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC (Roswell, GA) Escrow 101 - Part 1 Escrow 101 - Part 2 Escrow 101 - Part 3 Escrow 102 - Part 1

Members

Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”

The Honorable William Houston Brown

April 10, 2022

Selected Consumer Opinions Since January 1, 2022 Automatic Stay Denial of stay relief was final and appealable, although it was “without prejudice.”Deciding an issue not addressed in Ritzen Grp., Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 140 S.Ct. 582 (2020), the Ninth Circuit concluded that the bankruptcy court’s order denying stay relief was final and appealable, despite its “without prejudice” language, because...

Members

Small Business Reorganization Act…(“SBRA”) H.R. 3311 – PART ONE

September 15, 2019

By Jan Hamilton, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Topeka, KS) “I do not suggest my thoughts here are anywhere close to exhaustive. . . . Of course, my thoughts may be off mark on one or more items, but the discussions need to start somewhere, so here we go…” See also: 2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice – Overview

Members

Spoofing and the Legal Profession: No One is Immune

Ryan Bourgeois, Jeffrey Fleming, Lauren O’Neil Funseth

September 8, 2024

Spoofing scams hit with $10.5 trillion warning! If it were measured as a country, cybercrime would be the world’s third-largest economy after the United States and China. As its frequent mention in the news cycle demonstrates, no industry is immune – including the legal profession.

Members

Critical Case Comment

September 20, 2020

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville) A Non-Governmental Private Student Loan Obligation is not always excepted from discharge by § 523(a)(8). (Holmes) McDaniel v. Navient Solutions, LLC, 2020 WL 5104560 (August 31, 2020) Case Summary Bryon and Laura McDaniel filed a Chapter 13 petition in 2009. They acknowledged that, among...

Members

Whose Plan is it Anyway?

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

November 24, 2024

This case is more than meets the eye at first glance. Chapter 13 debtor cannot be compelled to propose a plan that delays vesting.

Members

Progeny of Taggart: In re Gravel and Newrez, LLC v. Beckhart

September 12, 2021

By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction In re Taggart In 2019, the Supreme Court in In re Taggart1 ruled that the acts alleged in that case to be in violation of a discharge injunction did not empower the bankruptcy court to find the creditor in contempt. In so holding, the Court ostensibly attempted to strike...

Members