The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment: Miller v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Middle District of TN
Miller v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, 2012 WL 286865 (10th Cir, Feb. 1, 2012) (Portfilio)
A creditor, seeking relief from the automatic stay, must establish its right to enforce the underlying note and where that note is endorsed in blank, the creditor generally must produce the original Note; the Rooker-FeldmanDoctrine does not preclude a debtor from challenging the standing of the creditor when that creditor obtained a judgment of foreclosure in state court.
Case Summary
The Millers had executed . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
CARES Act Financial Hardship ‘Laundry List’
While Chapter 7 Filings Continue to Decline, Chapter 13 Filings are Trending Slightly Upward
Passing of Retired Ohio Judge
Critical Case Comment – You Gotta Tell SOMEBODY!
The Case of the Naked Client
William E. Heitkamp (44)
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
Supreme Court Agrees to Revisit Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy
Deconstructing the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Obduskey Says Lawyers Conducting Nonjudicial Foreclosure Are Not “Debt Collectors”
Escrow 102 – Part 3 of 4