By Cathy Moran, Esq. (Redwood City, CA) No matter how many hoops the client dutifully jumped through, without adequate inquiry and communication, the bankruptcy attorney was slammed for unbundling his services. The representation agreement at issue excluded representation in any adversary proceeding filed, as do most such agreements, I imagine. The client initialed every paragraph of the 19-paged representation agreement,...
Litigation In Bankruptcy Court: It Can Be A Trying Ordeal – Part 1
Print This Article
Link to Post:
Tom Waldron, a former bankruptcy judge and current Advisor to the NACTT Academy, lives in Tucson, AZ.[email protected].
Introduction
It is fair to observe that not all bankruptcy lawyers are experienced in participating effectively in litigation, specifically – evidentiary hearings in bankruptcy court. Examining the reasons for this phenomenon are beyond the scope of this small series; however, accepting this assertion as true, this series of articles is intended to examine litigation in bankruptcy, specifically – evidentiary hearings . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From 5 Divisions to 4 Grandchildren, 3+ pets, 2 Hobbies and 1 Private Practice: The “Retirement” of Robert Wilson
An Open Thank You Letter to NACTT – Reflections from a New(er) Trustee: My First Two Years
Critical Case Comment–The Not DSO POC
6 Steps to Ethical Unbundling of Bankruptcy Representation
2019 Legislation Affecting Bankruptcy Practice
Ensure You Understand Insurance in Bankruptcy
From the Editor – Debtor’s Attorney
Fulton’s Aftermath – What Do Chapter 13 Practitioners Need To Know?
Creditors’ Rights and Debtors’ Protections at the Intersection of Consumer Bankruptcy and UCC Article 9 – Part IV
Critical Case Comment