The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Critical Case Comment – In re Vining, 2008 WL 2073966 (Bankr. N.D. N.Y. May 14, 2008)
Print This Article
Link to Post:
In re Vining, 2008 WL 2073966 (Bankr. N.D. N.Y. May 14, 2008)
The disposable income test mandates distributions of a minimum amount to unsecured creditors each month of a Chapter 13 Plan.
Summary of the Case
An unsecured creditor and the Chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the debtor's proposed Chapter 13 plan, arguing that the debtor was not paying all projected disposable income over the applicable commitment period. Although the original objection . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases Part 9 More from the Supreme Court: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC
In Re Carter: A Hard Case (Maybe) Making Bad Law?
Here’s What Taxpayers Should Consider When Determining If They Need to File
Unredeemed Pawned Property and Chapter 13 Plan Confirmation: Must a Pawnbroker Object?
Escrow 101 and 102
Critical Case Comment – Bad Faith to Not Pay Both Tests?
Small Business Reorganization Postscript 2
Chapter 13 No-Look Fees
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases – Part II: Thomas v. Midland Funding, LLC