The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Administrative expense allowed to attorney for substantial contribution in Chapter 13 case. The district court affirmed allowance to a law firm for administrative expense under § 503(b)(3)(D) for its substantial contribution to a case by its successful objection to an exemption claim in annuities. The law firm had represented the Chapter 7 trustee prior to conversion of the case to Chapter 13 and had objected to the exemption in the Chapter 7 phase of the case. On conversion, the law firm was a creditor for unpaid fees . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Ask Ms. Ps & Qs
From the Archives – Escrow 101 and 102
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Statute and Rules Amendments Not Related to SBRA
Just the Facts, Ma’am – Consolidated Appropriations Act, December 27, 2020
On More Effective Writing
Of Grace Periods and Mortgage Payments
Are 401(k) Contributions Disposable Income or Not?
Legal Aid and Who Are Our Chapter 13 “Customers”
No Room for Error? Determining Whether Your “Secured” Creditor Has a Fatally Deficient UCC-1
Federal District Court Affirms Decision that Residential Loan Modification Does Not Alter Lien Priority in Pennsylvania