The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From Morgan King’s Guide to Abusive Debt Collection Practice
Print This Article
Link to Post:
¶ 3.1(b) The Telephone
In Abrams v. MiraMed Revenue Grp., LLC (S.D. Ind., 2013) the debtor claimed the debt collector contacted her notwithstanding the collector knew or should have known that the debtor was represented by counsel and violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(a)(2).
The court said:
"Kirk alleges that MMRG improperly placed 39 telephone calls to his house over a nine-week period in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692d(5); that MMRG improperly attempted to communicate with Mr. Kirk after being informed that Mr. Kirk obtained counsel."
The Act . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Appendix – A Review of Residential Mortgage “Stripping,” Recent Developments and the Effect of 11 U.S.C. § 1111(b)
Avoidance Powers in Chapter 13 – Part 4 of 6
The Unintended Filing Bar – Don’t Ignore MFR on Surrendered Property
The Proposed Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act: A Political Analysis
How to Build and Strengthen Your Chapter 13 Debtor Practice
Private Collection Agencies – What You and Debtors Need to Know
New Payment Option Available to Taxpayers in Private Debt Collection Program
Critical Case Comment – Although a Mess, Month-to-Month Lease Assumed
Supreme Court Revisits Finality of Orders in Bankruptcy: Comment on Ritzen and Review of “Finality”
Meet a Newish Trustee