The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
Under 1329 the ‘Disposable Income Test’ Applies In A Post-Confirmation Plan Modification – Doesn’t It?
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Joseph A. Bledsoe, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Recently, I had a spirited conversation with a reputable debtors’ attorney regarding the application of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b) to a post-confirmation plan modification under 11 U.S.C. § 1329. Now, I know this topic is old news for most of you, and that courts have been considering this issue since before I got my law license, but please stay with me.
I received a proposed modification and emailed the debtors’ attorney to request some supporting documentation – namely, an . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020 Introduced
Critical Case Comment
Recent Cases Navigate Retirement Account Exemptions
Escrow 101 – Part 1 of 3
Today’s AI Stands to Create Work for Lawyers
Rules, Means-Test Amounts and Miscellaneous Fees: Changes Wrap Up 2020
Millions of ITINs Set to Expire in 2019; IRS Says Renew Early to Prevent Refund Delays
Meet Another New Trustee
Critical Case Comment – Watch for Opportunities to Bifurcate Home Mortgage Claims
Automatic Stay Denial of Stay Relief was Final and Appealable, Although It Was “Without Prejudice.”