The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Lien Stripping
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Court could not strip lien on tenancy by entirety. In Chapter 13 filed by only one spouse, the debtor could not strip off lien with no value on property owned as tenants by entirety. The bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to modify a lienholder’s rights as to the non-debtor’s property interest. Alvarez v. Grigsby (In re Alvarez), 733 F.3d 136 (4th Cir. 2013).
_______________________________
The Honorable William Houston Brown retired in 2006 as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western District of Tennessee . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Chapter 13 Discharge Expanded by COVID Relief Legislation
The Long Reach of R. 3002.1
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act
Win Now, Wreck Later: A Tale of Bankruptcy and Mortgage Servicing
Critical Case Comment–Should’a Returned the Car
A Sappy Farewell to Jeff Kellner as the Dayton Chapter 13 Trustee
Recent Trends in the Interpretation of Midland v. Johnson and the Applicability of the FDCPA to Bankruptcy Cases
The Uneasy Co-Existence of Federal and State Consumer Remedies in Bankruptcy Cases – the Fourth Circuit Weighs In
How to Manage Unprofessional and Discourteous Attorneys
Critical Case Comment