{"id":15628,"date":"2015-05-31T17:26:31","date_gmt":"2015-05-31T17:26:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/considerchapter13.org\/?p=15628"},"modified":"2015-05-31T17:26:31","modified_gmt":"2015-05-31T17:26:31","slug":"welp-wellness-is-decided-a-huge-victory-for-the-bankruptcy-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/considerchapter13.org\/2015\/05\/31\/welp-wellness-is-decided-a-huge-victory-for-the-bankruptcy-system\/","title":{"rendered":"Welp, Wellness is Decided . . . A HUGE Victory For The Bankruptcy System"},"content":{"rendered":"

Parties may consent to bankruptcy court hearing Stern<\/em> claims.<\/strong> There was likely a collective sigh of relief by many bankruptcy attorneys and judges as a result of the majority decision of the Supreme Court in Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif<\/em>, decided May 26. In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the majority held that Article III permits a bankruptcy judge to adjudicate Stern<\/em>-type claims, provided the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent. Moreover, the consent does not necessarily have to be express, but implied consent must meet the knowing and voluntary standard. <\/p>\n

The opinion may be accessed by clicking here<\/a>. (Not password protected)<\/em><\/p>\n

See Also:<\/strong><\/p>\n