The NACTT Academy offers a comprehensive community for bankruptcy professionals seeking to advance their education in consumer bankruptcy.
ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.
These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.
Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.
The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.
From the Editor – Claims
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Debtor’s objection to tax claim for being “too low” was rejected. Noting that the debtor could not benefit prior to distribution to creditors, in event trustee found assets for distribution, debtor’s objection to claim filed by tax creditor on basis that claim was “too low” was rejected. “The debtor comes last, not first, and is not entitled to any surplus unless and until all timely and untimely claims are paid in full with interest. 11 U.S.C. § 726(a).” In re Gaulsh, ___ B.R. ___ . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
U.S. Trustee Program to Implement Virtual Section 341 Meetings of Creditors Nationwide
2022 Bankruptcy Procedure Year in Review: Revised Statute and Rules and Selected Cases – Part 1 Amended Statute and Rules Amendments Not Related to SBRA
List It or Lose It: When Actual Knowledge Isn’t Enough
Legal Aid and Who Are Our Chapter 13 “Customers”
The Case for Conduit Mortgage Payments
Escrow 102 – Part 3 of 4
Escrow 101 – Part 3 of 3
Fastest Way to Check Tax Refund Is ‘Where’s My Refund?’ Tool at IRS.Gov
ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Definition of “Tax Return” for Purposes of Nondischargeability
In re Fulton: Seventh Circuit Affirms Its Position with Majority of Circuits on Passive Retention of Property as Violation of Sections 362 and 542