SCOTUS Cases Every Bankruptcy Lawyer Should Know Part 2 of 8

In the continually evolving field of consumer bankruptcy law, a series of Supreme Court decisions shape how cases are administered nationwide. Over the coming months, we will highlight key decisions that every bankruptcy practitioner should recognize—both by name and by the issues they resolve. This week’s ‘memory work’ is: Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, Law v. Siegel, Hamilton v. Lanning, and Butner v. US.

Unlock This Article

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:

Learn more about the membership.

Please sign in to continue reading this content.

The Honorable John P. Gustafson

United States Bankruptcy Judge, Northern District of Ohio

John P. Gustafson was appointed United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Ohio in April 2014. In his former life, he was a bankruptcy law clerk, an associate and partner in a law firm representing both debtors and creditors, a solo bankruptcy practitioner representing debtors, banks and trustees, the staff attorney to a Chapter 13 trustee, and from October 2007 to April 2014 he was the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division. Judge Gustafson regularly writes and speaks on a variety of bankruptcy issues.

A Pricey Lesson in Chapter 13 Fees

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

October 6, 2024

The district’s “no-look” fee is just a guideline for the court to assess what is reasonable for a debtor’s attorney to charge for filing a Chapter 13 case: the debtor’s attorney seeking something beyond it must prove that the fee is justified.

Members

Wrong Address, Real Consequences

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

June 29, 2025

Providing notice to a creditor at an address listed on a credit report did not prevent the bankruptcy court from an annulment of the automatic stay resulting in validation of post-petition foreclosure of debtor’s home.

Members

ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Remedies for Discharge Violation

May 12, 2019

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Trustee (Nashville, TN) One of the principle goals of a consumer that chooses to file bankruptcy is to obtain a discharge under § 524. Despite its importance, however, there is much more legal discussion on the logistics and the process of automatic stay under § 362 that is in existence during the pendency...

Members

Meet a Newish Trustee

January 24, 2021

On October 1, 2019, John G. Jansing was appointed Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Southern District of Ohio at Dayton. John took over from Jeff Kellner, who retired and moved to New Hampshire. John had some great mentors: Herb Beskin in Charlottesville, Marge Burks in Cincinnati and Faye English in Columbus. John toured Herb’s office in January 2020 and...

ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy – Judicial Estoppel

June 30, 2019

By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) Over the past twenty years, the judicial estoppel doctrine has had a significant impact on people who file bankruptcy. Judicial estoppel has grown to be a significant issue within the consumer bankruptcy system. The Commission was asked to address it. Judicial estoppel is a doctrine created to protect the...

Members

Are Your Loyalties Divided?

August 22, 2021

By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) When a married couple books a bankruptcy consultation, you have an immediate problem: There be dragons, as early map makers helpfully provided. Because, as a lawyer friend of mine says: Anytime there are two people sitting across from you, you have a conflict of interest. That pithy expression has stuck with me and...

Members

Judiciary Still Operating as Shutdown Starts

The Academy

October 5, 2025

. . . at least through Friday, October 17th

Brace & Beyond: Joint Tenancy & Transmutation

November 8, 2020

By Cathy Moran, Esq., Moran Law Group (Redwood City, CA) For Californians, the CA Supreme Court’s decision in Brace this summer upended our understanding of joint tenancy and community property. For decades, we “knew” that a property couldn’t be . . . It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members. Join...

Members

From the Archives

Debbie Langehennig

December 31, 2023

From the archives is a expansive piece on 3002.1.

Members

Atlanta Debtor Attorney/Firm Sanctioned

The Academy

August 11, 2024

From Page 4 of Memorandum and Order “Because Kakol’s representation of Debtor in this case fell drastically below the standard for acceptable representation of individual debtors in chapter 13 cases as discussed in greater detail below, he and the Kakol Firm will be sanctioned as follows: (1) they will be required to disgorge any and all fees paid in connection...