Musings from a Hapless BAP Law Clerk: Part 2 – Finding the Right Case to Appeal: Finality and Standing

This week, Attorney Hayes brings readers an excellent outline on finality and standing. “. . . . final order is a strange animal in the bankruptcy world.”

Unlock This Article

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:

Please sign in to continue reading this content.

Hayes Jury
Senior Counsel, RHM Law, LLP (Los Angeles, CA)

M. Jonathan Hayes has practiced consumer bankruptcy law primarily for the past 42 years in Southern California. He recently completed a two-year sabbatical as the BAP Law Clerk first for Judge Laura Taylor in San Diego and then for Judge William Lafferty in Oakland. He is now Senior Counsel to the bankruptcy firm of RHM Law, LLP. Jon has been an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of West Los Angeles School of Law for the past 33 years where he has taught Bankruptcy, Business Associations and other subjects. Jon was a member of the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization, Bankruptcy Law Advisory Commission, 2010 to 2018. He was Vice-Chairman for the year 2016-2017 and Chairman for the year 2017-2018. He was President of the Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney’s Assn (“cdcbaa”), 2013 and 2014, and is a member of the Board of Directors 2008 to present. He was a Lawyer Representative to the Central District Judicial Conference, 2014 to 2019. Today he has joined with Hon. Meredith Jury (Ret.) to form a bankruptcy appellate “dream team” with six other bankruptcy attorneys throughout the 9th Circuit to help consumer attorneys with their bankruptcy appeals. Jon has written four books entitled, “A Summary of Chapter 13” published in November 2019; “A Summary of Bankruptcy Law, Third Edition” published in December, 2016; “Bankruptcy Jurisprudence from the Supreme Court, Second Edition” published in 2016; and “Melvyn ‘Deacon’ Jones: My 40 years with the Blues Legends,” published in 2004. All are available on Amazon.com. You can reach Jon at jhayes@rhmfirm.com.

Related Articles

arya
August 10, 2025
BAPCPA introduced a new mathematical calculation to § 522(f) for use in determining the avoidance of judicial liens. When does this make a difference?
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
July 14, 2024
These cases are of specific interest to creditors but debtor attorneys and trustees also should be aware. Chapter 7 debtor bears the burden of proof of demonstrating eligibility in order to convert to Chapter 13; such proof requires them to demonstrate that they have regular income adequate to fund a Chapter 13 plan. AND . . . Chapter 13 plan fails to satisfy the eligibility requirements if it depends upon gifts or loans to be feasible.
Members
August 2, 2020
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired) Dismissal with 180-day bar affirmed. The debtors had filed eight Chapter 13 cases over eight years, with each dismissed, and in 2019 the spouses filed three more cases. A mortgage creditor moved for relief from the automatic stay and dismissal in each of the cases. The cases were dismissed with a 180-day bar...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
I never set out to be a bankruptcy lawyer, much less a trustee. It was always my intent to be trial lawyer. The thrill of victory, the agony of defeat, and the captive audience of a jury; having to think fast on your feet was exciting. Facing jurors and witnesses with a modicum of confidence was what my view of...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
January 5, 2025
Chapter 13 debtor has the right to modify a confirmed Chapter 13 plan to pay off the plan early; at modification the “best interest of creditors test” applies to the modified plan as of the effective date of the modification.
Members
boltz2
June 22, 2025
Boltz comments on a study from ScienceDirect on the vicious cycle between shame and financial hardship.
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
August 21, 2022
Where a Chapter 13 plan treats a claim as secured only by the debtor’s mobile home under § 506 and not real property, the effect of a notice of fees, costs and charges is irrelevant. (Coleman) In re White, 2022 WL 2826531 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. July 19, 2022) Case Summary Shalonda White filed a Chapter 13 petition in July of...
Members
McCormick2
In the fall of 2021, Michael McCormick provided subscribers with an EXCELLENT, expository, seven-part outline on mortgage escrow. This information is still relevant today.
Members
Sensenich
March 16, 2025
A former standing trustee considers a new chapter of life – an alternative to retirement. You gotta read all the way to the end!! “It was almost two years ago that across from the dinner table my wife of 45 years, and office manager of 35 years, announced that she was ‘done’.”
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
June 21, 2026
Keathley should now be added to your list of important Supreme Court cases. Be sure to take a look at the concurring opinions. See also: Supreme Court Gets Judicial Estoppel Right, at Least More Right
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: