Re-Examining the Means Test Cost of Home Ownership

From June: Bankruptcy lawyers can better present non-mortgage homeownership expenses to reflect current economic realities on the means test. By advocating for realistic expense allowances, based on a percentage of the home’s purchase price, attorneys can ensure fairer assessments and more successful bankruptcy plans. Additionally, Trustees and Judges should look at Atty Moran’s analysis here – change will take the whole village.

Unlock This Article

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:

Learn more about the membership.

Please sign in to continue reading this content.

Cathy Moran, Esq.

Head of Moran Law Group

Cathy Moran has headed her own small firm Moran Law Group in Redwood City, California, for over 40 years. Family law and tax issues as they play out in bankruptcy are areas of particular interest to Cathy.

Enforcing Chapter 13 Payroll Deductions

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

May 5, 2024

Failure of an employer to comply with the terms of a payroll deduction order justifies a finding of contempt and the award of costs, attorney’s fees, and potential referral for criminal action.

Members

Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 12, 2023

When a mortgage servicer objects to the plan based on its failure to pay mortgage arrears in equal monthly payments, § 1325(a)(5)(B) requires the debtor to amend to pay the arrears in equal monthly payments. (Hanan) In re Randell, 638 B.R. 104 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. January 19, 2022) Case Summary Ms. Randell proposed a rather conventional Chapter 13 plan, seeking...

Members

New Judge Appointed

The Academy

September 8, 2024

Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit have appointed J. Barrett Marum as the next bankruptcy judge on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California.

What to Think About When You’re Thinking About Litigating: One Attorney’s Perspective

Beverly M. Burden

June 29, 2025

Bankruptcy professionals must weigh when to litigate, compromise, or concede in resolving disputes. The key is to choose a path based on clear judgment rather than emotion or ego.

Members

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa Ten Years After

May 3, 2020

By Hon. Brian Lynch, United States Bankruptcy Judge, Western District of Washington, Tacoma Division When the Supreme Court issued United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa1 on March 23, 2010, commentators were perplexed.2 On the one hand, the Court upheld the 9th Circuit’s ruling allowing a hardship discharge of student loans in a chapter 13 plan. The Court held that...

Members

Critical Case Comment – Objection to Entire Housing Allowance Overruled

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

March 3, 2024

This is a potential BIGGIE . . . Where a Chapter 13 debtor incurs one relatively small expense covered by the IRS Local Standards, the debtor is entitled to deduct from CMI the entire allowance to calculate Projected Disposable Income.

Members

Safeguarding the Promise of a Fresh Start: Utilizing RESPA to Challenge Mortgage Servicing Errors Post-Discharge

Stephen F. Relyea

July 10, 2022

For many of the consumer debtors my firm represents, the primary purpose of filing bankruptcy is to save their home or other real estate from being foreclosed upon by their mortgage servicer. We help those debtors file and comply with chapter 13 plans that propose to resolve their defaulted mortgages in a variety of ways, which might include curing pre-petition...

Members

From the Editor

April 7, 2019

By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Attorney Fees - Chapter 13 debtor’s attorney not entitled to recovery under § 330 of fees that were incurred in defending prior attorneys’ sanctions motion. The debtor’s prior attorneys had sought to impose sanctions on the current attorney, and that attorney successfully defended against sanctions. However, the fees incurred by the...

Members

A Penny for Your Thoughts/$375 for the Notice

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

June 7, 2026

While a creditor holding a mortgage lien on debtor’s principal residence is allowed to supplement its claim by costs, charges, and fees, and may assert these additional costs if the underlying mortgage provides for them, the fees are not awarded unless the notices are required under Rule 3002.1; fees incurred for attorneys preparing notices that are not required by Rule 3002.1 cannot be recovered from the debtor.

Members

Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules

Henry E. Hildebrand, III

December 4, 2022

Chapter 13 plan which provided a specific amount to be cured on a reverse mortgage under § 1322(b)(5) would be controlled by the specific term of the plan provision and not by the larger proof of claim filed by the creditor. (Baer) In re Edelstein, 2022 WL 16730027 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. November 7, 2022) Case Summary The Edelsteins filed Chapter...

Members

Re-Examining the Means Test Cost of Home Ownership

Link to Post:

Unlock This Article

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position:

Please sign in to continue reading this content.

Cathy Moran, Esq.

Head of Moran Law Group

Related Articles

Enforcing Chapter 13 Payroll Deductions

Critical Case Comment – If Objection, Arrears Gotta’ Be Equal Monthly Installments

New Judge Appointed

What to Think About When You’re Thinking About Litigating: One Attorney’s Perspective

United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa Ten Years After

Critical Case Comment – Objection to Entire Housing Allowance Overruled

Safeguarding the Promise of a Fresh Start: Utilizing RESPA to Challenge Mortgage Servicing Errors Post-Discharge

From the Editor

A Penny for Your Thoughts/$375 for the Notice

Critical Case Comment – The Plan Rules

Academy

Members

Website

Legal

Looking to Become a Member?

Webinars

Member Articles

Industry News

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: