Forthcoming, 113 California Law Review (2025)
Vanderbilt Law Research Paper No. 24-30

Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4878756 

Summary:

Past-due child support debt cannot be forgiven, or discharged, in bankruptcy. This policy is grounded in the assumption that all child support debt goes to a parent taking care of a child. However, billions of dollars of unpaid child support debt are not owed to the parent, but instead to the government. The government is owed this debt through a welfare cost recovery system which requires custodial parents that file for welfare benefits to pursue child support from noncustodial parents and assign those rights to the government. This debt, which I coin “welfare debt,” oftentimes results in an increased interaction with the criminal justice system, including a cycle of incarceration and criminal fines and fees. The individuals that are stuck in this welfare debt-incarceration cycle follow recognizable racial and socioeconomic lines of vulnerability and marginalization. For the bankruptcy system to uphold its normative principle of forgiving burdensome debt for the most economically vulnerable individuals, welfare debt must be forgiven.

Commentary:

This article pairs with and continues the discussion of more generally discharging government debt by Prof. Langston in Discharging Government Debt.

Unmentioned, however, in this article is that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(a)(4), a Chapter 13 may provide that domestic support obligations (DSO) assigned to a government unit under 11 U.S.C.  §507(a)(1)(B), while remaining priority and non-dischargeable claims, need not be paid in full or at all during the 60-months of the case.  This falls well short of the author’s argument for allowing the discharge of these assigned DSO claims held by government units on the same terms as taxes, but it does often allow a debtor, without harm to his or her children, to defer repayment of these amounts to the government for as long as five years, which may afford time to both resolve the other debts (usually secured claims for mortgage arrearages or delinquencies on vehicle loans) and hopefully see an increase in the debtor’s income.

boltz2
Member of the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, P.C.

Edward C. Boltz is a managing partner of the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, P.C., where he has managed the firm’s office in Durham, North Carolina since 1998, representing clients in not only Chapter 13 and Chapter 7 bankruptcies, but also in related consumer rights litigation, including fighting abusive mortgage practices. Mr. Boltz received his B.A. from Washington University in St. Louis in 1993 and his J.D. from George Washington University in 1996. He is a member of the North Carolina State Bar, where he has been certified as a specialist in consumer bankruptcy law. He is admitted to practice before the Districts Courts in both the Eastern and Middle Districts of North Carolina. Mr. Boltz is the current President of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA). Previously, he has served as the Secretary of NACBA, and has jointly responsible for directing the NACBA State Chair program, Mr. Boltz has also served on the Bankruptcy Council for the North Carolina Bar Association and previously served as the Bankruptcy Chair for the North Carolina Association of Trial Lawyers.

Related Articles

Copy of Hildebrand-2016
September 29, 2024
Creditor with inadequate notice holds a fully nondischargeable obligation following a Chapter 7 discharge.
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
October 6, 2024
The district’s “no-look” fee is just a guideline for the court to assess what is reasonable for a debtor’s attorney to charge for filing a Chapter 13 case: the debtor’s attorney seeking something beyond it must prove that the fee is justified.
Members
August 22, 2021
By Cathy Moran, Esq., (Redwood City, CA) When a married couple books a bankruptcy consultation, you have an immediate problem: There be dragons, as early map makers helpfully provided. Because, as a lawyer friend of mine says: Anytime there are two people sitting across from you, you have a conflict of interest. That pithy expression has stuck with me and...
Members
December 15, 2019
By William Houston Brown, Editor/Adviser Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education Construing the statute of limitations for actions against debt collectors under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCA), the Supreme Court held on December 10, 2019, that “absent the application of an equitable doctrine, the statute of limitations in § 1692k(d) begins to run on the date on which the...
Members
Academy-emeritus-Logo-gold3
February 12, 2023
Previously the Emeritus Trustees (“ETC”) were asked to comment on “How to Manage Unprofessional and Discourteous Attorneys”. We now turn to ETC to share their collective wisdom when addressing the issues raised by incompetent, unprepared, and negligent bankruptcy counsel. Chapter 13 Trustees are required to administer cases in accordance with the duties set forth in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1302 and...
Members
moran_cathy
January 23, 2022
The no man's land between the mortgage due date and late payment is a persistent trouble spot for Chapter 13 practitioners. Are there arrears when the case is filed during the grace period and the payment made before it was late? In Borre, Judge Ronald Sargis of ED CA said no. He held that the payment was not in default...
Members
November 7, 2021
By Lawrence R. Ahern III, Brown & Ahern (Nashville, TN) Introduction This year's changes in the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure are summarized below. They will be followed, in Part 2, by a digest of selected judicial decisions in the past year of interest for their procedural implications. December 1, 2021, Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules 2005, 3007, 7007.1 and 9036 On...
Members
June 23, 2019
By Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) Let’s take the following set of facts and see how it plays out in the labyrinthian world of hardship discharge of student loan debt. The case is In re Lozada (Lozada v. Educational Credit Management Corporation), 594 B.R. 212 (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. 2018). Years ago (30...
Members
Gardner
November 13, 2022
Question: May a servicer charge to generate a payoff quote? Answer: 1026.36(c)(3) Payoff statements. In connection with a consumer credit transaction secured by a consumer's dwelling, a creditor, assignee or servicer, as applicable, must provide an accurate statement of the total outstanding balance that would be required to pay the consumer's obligation in full as of a specified date. The...
Members
September 8, 2019
By Angela M. Scolforo, Staff Attorney to Herbert L. Beskin, Chapter 13 Trustee (Charlottesville, VA) In Hurlburt v. Black,1 the en banc Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned its prior decision in Witt,2 and held that Bankruptcy Code § 1322(c)(2) authorizes modification of some home mortgage loans through bifurcation and cram down. This enables debtors to cram down home mortgage...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: