By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) It constitutes an unfair discrimination, violative of 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(1), for a Chapter 13 plan which would pay more to a student loan than to the remaining general unsecured creditors. (Somers) In re Kane, 603 B.R. 491 (Bankr. C.D. Kan. June 18, 2019) Case Summary Ronald Kane filed...
Critical Case Comment – But It’s a GOLF CART!
Print This Article
Link to Post:
A golf cart is a motor vehicle and may be exempted by a Chapter 7 debtor under state law. (Loyd) In re Smith, 2022 WL 3023209 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. July 28, 2022)
Case Summary
Bobby Smith filed a Chapter 7 petition and listed his golf cart as an exempt asset under Oklahoma law because it was a “motor vehicle.” The Chapter 7 trustee contested the exemption and the Court considered the matter in an evidentiary hearing.
Mr. Smith testified that he believed the golf cart had a value of approximately . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Henry E. Hildebrand, III
Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)
Henry E. Hildebrand, III has served as Standing Trustee for Chapter 13 matters in the Middle District of Tennessee since 1982 and as Standing Chapter 12 Trustee for that district since 1986. He also is of counsel to the Nashville law firm of Belcher Sykes Harrington, PLLC. Mr. Hildebrand graduated from Vanderbilt University and received his J.D. from the National Law Center of George Washington University. He is a fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy and the Nashville Bar Foundation. He is Board Certified in consumer bankruptcy law by the American Board of Certification and serves on its faculty committee. He is Chairman of the Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee for the National Association of Chapter 13 Trustees (NACTT). He is on the Board of Directors for the NACTT Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and is an adjunct faculty member for the Nashville School of Law and St. Johns University School of Law. In addition, he served as a commissioner to the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy.
Related Articles
Small Business Reorganization Act
Critical Case Comment–“No Realistic Future Prospects”
Critical Case Comment–IRS and the “Innocent Spouse”
Critical Case Comment – Five Theories of Post-Confirmation Property Treatment
In re Crocker: New Approaches to Discharge Enforcement and Student Loan Dischargeability?
Chapter 13 Trustee Duties, Powers, And Limitations – Part 4
Critical Case Comment
The “Snapshot” Rule – Part 2: When is the Rule Not Determinative?
What Was the Most Unusual Debtor Asset or Case During Your Watch?
Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste: The Bankruptcy Amendments in the Consolidated Appropriations Acts of 2021