Keep Calm and Carry On – Observations Regarding CBRA

First, breathe deep and try to relax.

The Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative House Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee, with minimal notice, set an oversight hearing for September 29, 2022. The subcommittee is charged to deal with matters relating to bankruptcy. The subject of the hearing was to be the “Oversight of the Bankruptcy Code, Part 2: Ensuring a Fresh Start for Consumers.” This was an apparent continuation of the prior Congress’ consideration of the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020 (“CBRA”).

Hours prior to the hearing, Senator Elizabeth Warren introduced legislation entitled The Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2022. TheBill, S.4980, is markedly similar to the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 2020 which did not move when it was introduced in the waning days of the prior Congress.

Minutes before convening the Subcommittee hearing, it was postponed. No rescheduled date was set.

The Subcommittee anticipated hearing from three panels. First, members of Congress to speak on the overview of the bankruptcy system (Senator Warren and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene were expected to testify). A second panel would be composed of law professors (some of whichactually drafted the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act) and several practitioners.

It is interesting to note that as of press time (10/7) the text of the bill remains unavailable at TheBill is 194 pages long and makes substantial changes to the current bankruptcy system. It repeals Chapter 13 and seeks to replace the two-chapter framework of consumer bankruptcy to a single chapter, Chapter 10. Were it enacted, the law would take effect one year after enactment. Just as in prior major modifications of the bankruptcy system, the end product will bear little resemblance to the original draft.

The legislation has been endorsed according to Senator Warren, by a number of consumer advocacy groups, including the Action Center on Race and the Economy, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Americans for Financial Reform, the AFL-CIO, the Consumer Federation of America, the National Consumer Law Center, Service Employees International, and the Center for Responsible Lending. Senator Warren’s website indicates that 86 law professors who specialize in bankruptcy and consumer law have sent a letter in support of this legislation.

Although it is somewhat mystifying that all of these endorsements would be generated by a nearly 200-page bill that has not been publicly released, except by Senator Warren about 24 hours before the oversight hearing. Assuming the original legislation is the framework of this legislation, bankruptcy professionals should take careful note of the provisions of the bill.

There are miles to go before the CBRA has any chance of becoming law.

It is interesting to note that, rather than referring this legislation to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Bill was referred to the Senate Finance Committee, a committee in which Senator Warren is a member.

Please pay attention to the Academy updates as this legislation works its way through this soon to be erstwhile Congress.

Copy of Hildebrand-2016

Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of Tennessee (Nashville)

Henry E. Hildebrand, III has served as Standing Trustee for Chapter 13 matters in the Middle District of Tennessee since 1982 and as Standing Chapter 12 Trustee for that district since 1986. He also is of counsel to the Nashville law firm of Belcher Sykes Harrington, PLLC. Mr. Hildebrand graduated from Vanderbilt University and received his J.D. from the National Law Center of George Washington University. He is a fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy and the Nashville Bar Foundation. He is Board Certified in consumer bankruptcy law by the American Board of Certification and serves on its faculty committee. He is Chairman of the Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee for the National Association of Chapter 13 Trustees (NACTT). He is on the Board of Directors for the NACTT Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and is an adjunct faculty member for the Nashville School of Law and St. Johns University School of Law. In addition, he served as a commissioner to the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy.

Related Articles

Copy of Hildebrand-2016
March 26, 2023
A 34-year-old Chapter 7 debtor could discharge his student loan obligation by establishing that he could not reasonably make payments on the balance, could not maintain a reasonable standard of living, and because the expiration of his payment term had already passed, his standard of living was likely to persist, with no realistic future prospects. (Silverstein) In re Wolfson, No....
May 21, 2023
For a system that is supposed to rehabilitate personal finances and set debtors back on their feet, Chapter 13 nationwide is schizophrenic about on- going retirement savings, divided about whether post petition contributions to retirement accounts preclude confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan. Too many courts, in my opinion, come down barring voluntary provisions for old age for the 5...
July 7, 2019
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee (Nashville, TN) The Commission heard from several individuals and attorneys that related tales of Chapter 7 trustees negotiating a “carve out” with a lienholder on the debtor’s real property when there was no equity available in the property. The way this works is that when property came into a Chapter 7...
April 14, 2019
By William J. Purdy, III, Simmons & Purdy (Soquel, CA) Hundreds of thousands of taxpayers in the past few weeks have looked at or at least thought about, Form 1099-A or Form 1099-C documents they have received. Some arrived in the tax year a debt was allegedly cancelled. Others are issued by financial instructions many years after they should have...
August 15, 2021
By Nancy B. Rapoport, Garman Turner Gordon Professor of Law, Boyd School of Law, and Affiliate Professor of Business Law & Ethics, Lee Business School, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dear Readers: My guardian angel, Regina Logsdon has asked a great question:what should you do when your “Spidey sense” tells you that your client...
November 14, 2021
By Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Middle District of TN (Nashville) The automatic stay does not require a creditor pursuing a prepetition nonbankruptcy court action to dismiss that action once a bankruptcy case is filed; requesting continuances and attending status conferences do not constitute “continuation” of the prepetition action for purposes of the automatic stay....
February 5, 2023
Introduction This series reviews developments in bankruptcy procedure during 2022. Amendments to 16 rules and one new rule took effect December 1, 2022. Many reflected changes necessitated by the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA),1 and have been in place in the same or similar form on an interim basis since that legislation took effect.
May 5, 2019
By Judge Michael A. Fagone & Career Law Clerk Ciera S. Dye Although our Nation’s bankruptcy laws are uniform, chapter 13 practice in our Nation’s bankruptcy courts varies to a significant extent in the different judicial districts. One example of this variation is the treatment of postpetition borrowing by a consumer debtor in chapter 13.i Neither the Bankruptcy Code nor...
March 17, 2019
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Confirmation - Bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation. Distinguishing between “self-executing” provisions of the Code and those sections that were not “self-executing,” and discussing Espinosa’s impact on that distinction, District Court held that the bankruptcy court could not sua sponte object to confirmation based on the above- median...
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
August 21, 2022
Where a Chapter 13 plan treats a claim as secured only by the debtor’s mobile home under § 506 and not real property, the effect of a notice of fees, costs and charges is irrelevant. (Coleman) In re White, 2022 WL 2826531 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. July 19, 2022) Case Summary Shalonda White filed a Chapter 13 petition in July of...