I’ve been having nightmares about the 9th Circuit’s decision in Siegel for 20 years.
Broad strokes, Siegel (143 F.3d 525 (9th Cir. 1998) holds that a filed claim in a no asset bankruptcy case to which no one objects is entitled to preclusive effect in subsequent litigation by . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below: