By William Houston Brown, Adviser, Academy for Consumer Bankruptcy Education, Inc. and Lawrence R. Ahern, III, Brown and Ahern (Nashville, TN) In two February opinions, the Supreme Court addressed issues that appear in bankruptcy cases, one dealing with a common practice of entering nunc pro tunc orders and the other affecting determination of property rights under state law. In a...
From the Editor
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By The Honorable William Houston Brown (Retired)
Chapter 13 debtor lacked “person aggrieved” standing to appeal objection to trustee’s final report. The bankruptcy court had overruled the debtor’s objection to the trustee’s final report, and debtor’s appeal was dismissed, with the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel finding that debtor lacked “person aggrieved” standing to appeal. Debtor’s objection had not included amount of funds returned to her upon case dismissal. In re Marshall, _______B.R._______, 2020 WL 781661 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. Feb. 18, 2020).
____________________________ . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
From the Editor
Two Supreme Court Decisions with Effects on Bankruptcy Practice
Representing Elderly Clients in Bankruptcy – Part 3 of 3
Character Counts
From the Editor
Private Collection Agencies – What You and Debtors Need to Know
From the Editor – Dismissal
For Whom Does the Bell Toll?
Meet a New Trustee
Critical Case Comment