The Mississippi Bankruptcy Court in The Huntington National Bank vs. Ashley Mosby, case #21-11614, adversary case #21-1028, on September 1, 2022, denied the bank’s request to declare a debt non-dischargeable because the bank did not rely upon the debtor’s false statement. In this case the Debtor purchased a 2020 Dodge Challenger, financed by the bank, without disclosing she intended to...
Forced Vesting by Any Other Name – Just Might Work
Print This Article
Link to Post:
By Academy Staff
Those who have been around consumer bankruptcy for a while remember the halcyon days when a Debtor surrendered property in the Plan; Plan was confirmed; lender would foreclosure and file its deficiency claim; Debtor would complete the Plan; and obtain a discharge of all unsecured debts including the deficiency balance. Lenders were able to realize on the collateral with minimal problems; Debtors were able to get on with their lives; and Real Estate Agents were happy (after all, lenders had to hire someone to help dispose of foreclosed properties).
Then along came the great recession . . .
It looks like you are not signed in or registered! This content is only available to members.
Or Sign In Below:
Related Articles
Did You Really Rely Upon That?
From the Editor
Important Research Survey
I Win. I Win. Trustee Holds Record for Having the Oldest Open Chapter 13 Case
LLC’s and Chapter 13
Shoe Leather to Chapter 13 Success: The Power of Referral Marketing
Does Section 1325(b)(1)(A) Hold Your Interest?
In re Lazaro: Non-Monetary Default and § 1322(b)(5)
Chapter 7 Trustee Compensation for Uncovered Equity
Trustee Cannot Require Debtor to Treat Nondischargeable Student Loan Debts in a Separate Class