I Win. I Win. Trustee Holds Record for Having the Oldest Open Chapter 13 Case

By Helen M. Morris, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia

It really takes so little to make a Chapter 13 Trustee happy—debtor’s counsel using calculators when they draft a plan ($100 for 36 months is NOT $4,936.87 no matter how many times it is repeated); saying “the Trustee is right” distinctly in open court during the course of a hearing; or closing a 1999 (yep 1999, that is not a typo) case after nearly 14 years.

The case in question was filed, apparently, because the debtors, a doctor and her husband, didn’t understand that tricky thing about paying taxes. The pre-petition priority tax liability was large—more than $81,000 to the IRS and about $8,000.00 to the State of West Virginia (and another almost $9,000.00 as unsecured). Not surprisingly, the proposed plan didn’t cash flow. An A.P. to discharge the student loans, moratoria and amendments later, the case was finally confirmed in month 55–for 60 months from confirmation. (The now retired judge often stated that the 60 months set out in the Code was a guideline.)

Who knew that those pesky income taxes were to be paid every year? The State had post-petition tax claims in excess of $34,000.00. The IRS chose not to file 1305 claims in the Chapter 13 case.

The original gross base was eventually met, but the priority claims still weren’t paid. So, after giving the debtors an opportunity to deal with the issues they had created, I filed yet another motion to dismiss—this time alleging that the debtors had failed to complete the plan in 60 months.

At the hearing, debtors’ counsel orally asked the Court for a hardship discharge “because the trustee wants to get rid of this case.”

To which I replied, “Yes, I do; that’s why I filed a motion to dismiss.” I also objected to an oral motion for a hardship discharge.

The hearing was continued, and debtors’ counsel filed a written motion for a hardship discharge for the reason that the debtors had now filed a Chapter 11 case (don’t ask—I have no idea! I didn’t even know a Chapter 11 had been filed until I read the motion for hardship discharge) and would pay their taxes in that case.

Neither holding the pleading up to a mirror nor against the light revealed any hidden messages or codes that provided a legal ground for hardship discharge, so I filed a lengthy objection. The two motions came on for hearing, at which time, the Court took the matter under advisement.

Winter 2012 came with icy roads, and the female debtor was fatally injured in an automobile accident. Since the female debtor was the breadwinner of the couple, I heartlessly waited for a voluntary dismissal of the case. Debtors’ counsel apparently thought I would concede that death gave the couple grounds for a hardship discharge.

In response to his letter about the female debtor’s death, I apologized for being insensitive, but as trustee I needed to know if there were insurance proceeds as a result of the accident as those were property of the estate. Frankly, I fully expected him to dismiss this case. Instead, he asked me what it would take to complete the case.

I gave him a figure that paid the claims in full—and he provided me with a check for that amount—not by return mail but certainly quicker than I had received other payments in the case. So, nearly 14 years after the case was filed, the claims were paid, and I filed a report of completion. I was—briefly–one happy camper.

It took a while to file the final report—just needed one more check to clear. Yes, you guessed it—the small debtor refund based on the difference between my payout figure being calculated on a 10% fee and the actual fee approved by the UST—hadn’t been cashed. I guess some debtors never get in a hurry, but just before it stale-dated, the surviving debtor negotiated the check.

The moral of this story: Patience is a virtue? No one would say that I’ve been patient with this case. All good things come to him/her who waits? Well, I did get a fee on the distribution and unsecured creditors who probably had written off their claims sometime before confirmation (a decade ago!) were paid in full. However, the debtors paid off taxes—some dating back to 1995—without interest and since we used to pay attorney fees at 4% of the plan payments, debtors’ counsel got an extra fee—so he benefitted from their stall and delay tactics (which I don’t think is a good thing).

I certainly do not believe that having had the distinction (infamy) of having the oldest open Chapter 13 case in the United States is a good thing.

No, the point of my saga is this: this case IS closed and I beat the 14th anniversary of its filing—albeit only by a couple of months!

__________________________

2013-01-26 16.11.10-1 Helen M. Morris has been the Chapter 13 trustee for the Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia since October 1, 1996. Prior to her appointment, she was in private practice in Huntington, WV, where she served as a Chapter 7 panel trustee in addition to representing both debtors and creditors in bankruptcy matters; but not in the same case. She has a Bachelor’s degree from Marshall University in Huntington, WV, and her law degree from Vanderbilt University School of Law in Nashville, TN.

No Author Biography has been linked to this Article.

Related Articles

image002
January 9, 2022
It has long been a vexing question for Trustees and attorneys alike: do Debtors have to disclose assets acquired post-petition? In a lengthy and well-documented opinion, Chief Bankruptcy Court Judge John Waites of South Carolina has presented his take on this issue and concluded, with some important exceptions, that they do not. The case is In re Thomas L. Boyd,...
Members
__ head shot
May 21, 2023
Chapter 13 plans and confirmation orders will occasionally include post-confirmation disclosure and turnover requirements for tax returns and refunds and for other types of post-petition recoveries and income. Debtors are expected, on their own and without the need for rigorous trustee oversight, to fulfill the turnover requirements as a condition of plan completion and discharge. What happens when the case...
Members
white-house-shutters
Chapter 13 in the Bankruptcy Code (1978 as amended) marks the first time that virtually all secured debts can be somewhat altered in a bankruptcy without getting the specific agreement of security holders.  Real benefit is provided to the debtors who have personal property with secured loans due.  Concepts including the automatic stay preventing enforcement or perfection of a security...
Members
August 30, 2020
By Wayne Silver, Wayne Silver Law (Redwood City, CA) The 120-day CARES Act eviction moratorium expired on Saturday, July 25. At the expiration of the moratorium, landlords covered by the federal moratorium could begin serving eviction notices, and begin filing eviction lawsuits 30 days thereafter. That means on Monday, August 24, 2020 the moratorium on evictions expired, while we face...
Members
March 24, 2019
By Wm. Houston Brown, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Retired) Discharge - Paying more than original loan balance would be undue hardship. The 59-year old debtor employed in aging and disability services couldn’t maintain a minimal living standard without discharge of substantial portion of student loan debt. The Court identified factors included in “minimal standards” in modern American society and found...
Members
KIMBALL
October 8, 2023
“In most cases, debtor’s counsel addresses only the argument that the debtor’s personal or financial affairs have substantially changed since dismissal of the preceding case.”
Members
gustafson2
Judge Gustafson and Daniel Tavera explore “Who Benefits” from work done in a Chapter 13 case, and they suggest that the title of this piece comes from an old-time radio show – “Yours Truly, Johnny Dollar” – one of the most popular radio shows in its day. It was a five-part show called “The Cui Bono Matter.” To hear a...
Members
April 26, 2020
By Joseph A. Bledsoe, III, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee for the Eastern District of North Carolina (New Bern) Under section 1113(b)(1)(C) of the CARES Act, upon the request of a debtor, and after notice and a hearing, a plan confirmed may be extended up to 7 years from the date the first payment under the original plan came due if...
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
September 3, 2023
To pay present value to a secured creditor, a reorganization plan may start with a treasury rate and add a risk factor and need not start with a prime rate plus a risk factor.
Members
Copy of Hildebrand-2016
June 18, 2023
When a debtor fails to disclose a post-petition asset as required by Local Rule and the terms of her plan, the trustee may seek a modification of the plan notwithstanding the expiration of the applicable commitment period; the best interest of creditors test applies only at commencement of the case and not to a plan modification; a trustee’s motion to...
Members

Looking to Become a Member?

ConsiderChapter13.org offers a forum to advance continuing education of consumer bankruptcy via access to insightful articles, informative webinars, and the latest industry news. Join now to benefit from expert resources and stay informed.

Webinars

These informative sessions are led by industry experts and cover a range of consumer bankruptcy topics.

Member Articles

Written by industry experts, these articles provide in-depth analysis and practical guidance on consumer bankruptcy topics.

Industry News

The Academy is the go-to source for the latest news and analysis in the Chapter 13 bankruptcy industry.

To get started, please let us know which of these best fits your current position: